Prosecutor for Constitution
Contemporary history tires this retired old farmer’s son turned
Texas drifter; chosen diversion is writing exercises of non
fiction future history. These lyrical visual prose short stories are
not fiction future history.
Prosecutor for Constitution: “play about United States Texas Senator’s trial for treason”
Author’s Disclaimer: Some write to teach while others write to entertain. Sometimes I write to teach by entertaining. Defendant’s name in Prosecutor For Constitution is John Bornyn. Whether others with similar sounding names are fools or traitors will be judged by future citizen historians.
Intro:
Truth is like bitter medicine for most Americans, and may be administered by sugarcoated entertainment in stories like Prosecutor for Constitution.
Marshall’s Law
Players:
Judge
Prosecutor
Defense Attorney
Defendant
Heavenly Angel Number Five
George Washington
Abraham Lincoln
Contents Note: Reference Documents verify Library Of Congress
Set: Spiritual Court Room
Judge Gabriel (to prosecutor): Why am I not surprised to see that defense attorney from TEXAS ON TRIAL is now working as a prosecutor for United States Constitution.
Prosecutor: Not wishing to waste time in convicting defendant of treason, the prosecution agrees to skip opening remarks and go straight to the evidence.
Prosecutor: Evidence that will prove that the defendant conspired and acted to replace America’s constitutional republic nation state with an internationalist moneylender oligarchy. Oligarchy is defined as a government in which a few exercises control for corrupt and selfish purposes. If the defendant’s treason prevails:
America the nation would cease to exist when national boundaries were replaced with something called the continental perimeter.
America’s Constitution would be replaced with something called North American Cooperative Security Act.
America’s executive, legislative and judicial institutions would become slaves to something called North American Parliamentary Group.
The United States of America would be renamed North American Community.
Prosecutor Continues: I would like to introduce and read a public document citing defendant U.S. Texas Senator John Bornyn’s own words. Prosecution Exhibit Number One, a public document.
Prosecutor walks over and stands behind defendant, and begins to read: North American Investment Act.
Defense Attorney: Objection, to prosecutor reading Exhibit One while standing behind my client.
Prosecutor: moving would only suggest that the defendant was ashamed of his words and guilty of treason, an action on my part that might prejudice the jury and deprive the defendant of due process.
Judge: Mr. Prosecutor, this court respects sincerity and holds cleverness in contempt. Proceed with caution.
Prosecutor: I will begin again.
North American Investment Fund Act (Introduced in Senate)
108th CONGRESS
2d Session
S. 2941
To authorize the President to negotiate the creation of a North American Investment Fund to promote economic and infrastructure integration among Canada, Mexico, and the United States, and for other purposes.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
October 7, 2004
Mr. BORNYN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations
A BILL
To authorize the President to negotiate the creation of a North American Investment Fund to promote economic and infrastructure integration among Canada, Mexico, and the United States, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `North American Investment Fund Act'.
SEC. 2. AUTHORITY FOR A NORTH AMERICAN INVESTMENT FUND.
The President is authorized to negotiate with the Governments of Canada and Mexico to create a North American Investment Fund, as described in this Act (hereinafter referred to as the `Fund'), by--
SEC. 3. PURPOSES.
The purposes of the Fund shall be--
(1) to promote economic and infrastructure integration among Canada, Mexico, and the United States;
(2) to promote education and economic development in Mexico; and
(3) to reduce the wealth gap between Mexico and Canada, and between Mexico and the United States.
SEC. 4. PROJECTS FUNDED.
(a) IN GENERAL- The Fund shall make grants for projects to carry out the purposes described in section 3, including projects--
(1) to construct roads in Mexico to facilitate trade
SEC. 5. CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE FUND.
(a) IN GENERAL- The terms of the agreement establishing the Fund shall, subject to the limitation in subsection (b), require the Governments of Canada, Mexico, and the United States to contribute to the Fund.
Prosecutor: Article III Section3 of the Unites States Constitution declares: Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted or treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act or on confession in open court.
Prosecutor continues: The defendant’s twice reading of the proposed law in public complies with the stipulation of “testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act”.
Before the defense attorney objects, I could subpoena every person on this planet who has seen or heard a tape of the defendant’s words.
Defense Attorney: No objection, defense agrees to the stipulation.
Prosecutor: I would now like to introduce and read excerpts from a public document containing testimony supporting the defendant’s treasonous efforts the defense has stipulated fulfills Constitutional standards for treason.
Judge Interrupts: The stipulation was to allow the twice readings to be witnesses not specific charges.
Prosecutor: You are correct Judge. The defendant’s words are witnesses to the specific act of attempting to replace the United States of America with a new political system known as “North American Community”.
(Prosecutor starts to read.): Prosecutor’s Exhibit Number Two: A public document.
American Community Approach to Security
June 9, 2005
(Edited) Testimony before a hearing of the Subcommittee on the Western
Hemisphere U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee. By vice President
and director of the Center for North American Studies.
As we approach the fourth anniversary of 9/11, it is time for us to step back from our trauma and the border and examine the problem in a broader context. The best way to assure security is not at our borders with Canada and Mexico and not by defining “security” in conventional and narrow terms. We need to think about these issues in the context of a continent that is integrating economically and socially at a rapid rate
What we need to do now is forge a North American Community, based on the premise that each member benefits from its neighbor’s success and is diminished by its problems.
In my statement, I will comment first on the emergence of North America, the next decade’s agenda, and the response by the three governments. Next, I will describe some of the recommendations of the Council Task Force Report and focus on the travel initiative and the security and border issues.
The U.S. Congress should also merge the U.S.-Mexican and U.S.-Canadian inter-parliamentary groups into a single “North American Parliamentary Group.” A third institution should be a “Permanent Tribunal on Trade and Investment.” A permanent court would permit the accumulation of precedent and lay the groundwork for North American business law.
North American governments can learn from the EU’s efforts to establish EU Educational and Research Centers in the United States. Centers for North American Studies in the United States, Canada, and Mexico would help people in all three countries to understand the problems and the potential of an integrated North America— and to think of themselves as North Americans. Scholarships should encourage North American students to study in each other’s country. Until a new consciousness of North America’s promise takes root, many of these proposals will remain impractical.
Perimeter: Instead of creating new obstacles at the border, we should find ways to ease traffic and harmonize safety and transportation obtain a Border Pass, which would be accepted at all border points within North America as a complement to passports.
The U.S., Mexican, and Canadian governments remain zealous defenders of an outdated conception of sovereignty even though their citizens are ready for a new approach. Each nation’s leadership has stressed differences rather than common interests. North America needs leaders who can articulate and pursue a broader vision.
I hope this Committee will pursue the North American agenda beyond the travel initiative considered here. These should be reviewed together with Senator Richard Lugar’s far-sighted bill for a “North American Cooperative Security Act” and Senator Bornyn’s “North American Investment Fund.” The time has come for us to define a true North American Community. (end of document)
Prosecutor: Prosecution for the Constitution’s first witness is Heavenly Angel Number Five.
Prosecutor to Heavenly Angel Number Five: Is there any entity or person who can confirm your identity?
Heavenly Angel Number Five: The Judge.
Judge: This is Heavenly Angel Number Five.
Prosecutor to Heavenly Angel Number Five: Did the defendant take an oath to God and or make a spiritual contract with God to “uphold, protect, and defend” the United States Constitution?
Heavenly Angel Number Five: Yes.
Prosecutor: Is the spirit of the defendant’s oath and or contract consistent with the United States Constitution and Prosecution for Constitution Exhibit Number One?
Heavenly Angel Number Five: No.
Prosecutor: Is the defendant in violation of his oath with God and or has the defendant broken his contract with God.
Heavenly Angel Number Five: Yes
Prosecutor: Based on your spiritual experiences, are individuals who violate oaths or break contracts with God more likely or less likely to engage in treason against their country, their republic, and their republic’s constitution?
Heavenly Angel Number Five: More Likely
Prosecutor: No more questions.
Defense Attorney: No questions. (Whispers to defendant.) Only a fool would challenge the integrity of one of Heaven’s Angels. I’m here to try and save your soul, not lose my mine.
Prosecutor: Prosecution for the U.S. Constitution calls George Washington as the next witness.
Prosecutor: Are you the George Washington who had occasion to be Commander and Chief of America’s Revolutionary forces who won America’s Independence from England, and are you the same George Washington who had occasion to serve as America’s first President?
George Washington: Yes to both questions.
Prosecutor: Mr. President, did you make the following statements in your Farwell Address. The basis of our political system is the right of the people to make and to alter their constitutions of government. But the Constitution which at any time exists, till changed by an explicit and authentic act of the whole people, is sacredly obligatory upon all.
Did you also state in your Farwell Address: It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world. There can be no greater error than to calculate upon real favors from nation to nation. It is an illusion, which experience must cure, which a just pride ought to discard.
George Washington: Yes to both.
Prosecutor to George Washington: Based on your knowledge of original intent of the United Sates Constitution, and your many earthly experiences with international tyrants; would you testify under oath before God himself that Prosecution for Constitution Exhibits One and Two represents words, actions, and associations of a patriot or traitor.
George Washington: Traitor. Traitor.
Defense Attorney: No questions. (Whispers to defendant.) Only a fool would challenge the integrity of George Washington. I’m here to try and save your life, not lose my mine.
Prosecutor: Prosecution for the Constitution calls President Abraham Lincoln to the stand.
Prosecutor: President Lincoln, did you have occasion to serve the United States of America during the 1860’s?
President Lincoln: Yes.
Prosecutor: How many Americans died in your service during your administration trying to uphold, protect and defend America’s Constitution?
President Lincoln: Including civilian casualties, one million plus one.
Prosecutor: That’s right you also died in service of your sacred oath to uphold, protect, and defend the Constitution and Bill of Rights. How does it make you feel when you see elected officials who took the same oath as you died for, creating and supporting documents like Prosecution for the Constitution Exhibits One and Two?
President Lincoln: Breaks my heart to think that all the suffering and sacrifices during our nation’s Civil War, a war between brothers and neighbors was in vain.
Prosecutor: Mr. Lincoln would you consider the defendant’s words and actions to be helpful or harmful to the Constitution you served through death?
President Lincoln: Beyond harmful.
Defense Attorney: Judge, how many more past away witnesses does the Prosecutor intend to call?
Prosecutor: I am prepared to call every past away soul who died defending America’s Constitution. Probably over four million, as for the exact total, your Honor would know that better than me.
Continuing: As for the lying, probably over fifty million who have suffered because of the defendant’s treasonous policies; again, your Honor would better know the exact number better than me.
Judge To Prosecutor: I warned you about being clever.
Prosecutor: With all due respect your honor, my commitment to total due process for the Constitution is about sincerity not being clever.
Judge: Perhaps the Prosecutor and Defense Attorney can reach an agreement that does not involve calling millions and millions of both living and past away witnesses.
Prosecutor Looking At Defendant Then Defense Attorney: Here is your one and only two choice deal.
One, defendant publicly hangs for treason; eternal damnation for defendant’s soul; and perpetual condemnation for defendant’s reputation; or
Two, defendant will be asked for any last words of contrition before he is publicly hanged for treason; the defendant can save his soul from eternal damnation and his reputation from perpetual condemnation by giving Americans names they can curse, despise, and hate more than his.
Prosecutor Looks at Defendant: Your choice traitor.
Defendant Starts To Speak:
