Politics Of Hate Purveyors
Conservatives are not responsible for politics of hate in contemporary America. Marxist Democrats and their allies internationalist Republicans not conservatives are purveyors of the politics of hate in America.
Side note before explaining the obvious, moderate when used as a verb not a noun is synonymous with the word compromise. Hence the more accurate name, Chamberlain McCain, who would compromise away every conservative principle to remain popular with his Democrat Party Senator friends.
Marxist Democrats and compromising Republicans operate by one basic belief: it is easier to turn people into public subsidy addicts than private self sufficient citizens. The almost funny irony is that Marxist Democrats and their compromising moderate Republicans are the first to denounce private sector slavery and also first to advocate public sector slavery better known as public subsidy addiction.
This writing exercise provides clues to three riddles just for you, How, with ironies about those who have a right to be wrong and those who have a right to be right.
Starting with what does not seem obvious for compromising Republicans and some Democrats. Remember America’s Declaration of Independence with life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness? Why life, no life no liberty. Why liberty, no liberty no pursuit of happiness or free will.
Seem ironic that free will is not free; the costs of free will includes individual responsibility, individual accountability, and self defense. When judgment day arrives, and it always seems too, I am just guessing that one is not responsible for other people’s free will decisions.
Again I am just guessing that responsibility for self defense does extend to protecting and defending one’s self, family, country, and constitutional republic from other people’s free will actions which threaten life, liberties, or properties. Are not inalienable rights a form of private properties?
Free will defensive actions should not be guided by blaming the innocent, like blaming conservatives for politics of hate when it is, you know who they are. Who would you blame first: child molester or child; drug dealer or adult under influence who hurts other people; thief of security guard asleep on duty; unethical politicians or people voting for lesser of two evils that guarantee electing premeditated evil?
Free will requires two sets of rules, one for citizens and one for American governments. The first set of rules is called The Ten Commandments, and the second set of rules is known as The Bill of Rights.
President Jackson not President Johnson was right with his equal opportunity without privilege. Why, Johnson’s unequal opportunity with privilege weakens free will, and was bad for America by establishing public sector slavery as an acceptable institution in America.
Why the passing interest in President Jackson? Rumor has it that some of the players and leaders in Texas Revolutionary War were covert emissaries for President Jackson.
Passing thought, perhaps contemporary conservatives should examine the value of their beliefs; President Jackson might suggest that beliefs not worth defending with sacrifices are beliefs not worth having. What about you who are participating in this writing exercise, are your conservative beliefs just for show, or are they worth defending with sacrifices?
Moving back to privileges which can be defined as special favors granted because of race, gender, poverty, wealth, laziness, or any number of human excuses.
Traits of privilege seekers are:
1. Greed, lust for power from public sector slavery for Marxist Democrats, lust for treasonous profits from international trade deals which threaten America’s national security by destroying national domestic manufacturing base by compromising Republicans like Chamberlain McCain who supports foreign nations building America’s military aircraft;
2. Hate, racists and feminists with their affirmative action policies and elections;
3. Vanity, environmental fascists not conservationists, religious zealots like Islamic fascists, America last court jesters and electronic news media;
4. Jealously, illegal immigrants with no respect for America’s laws or culture and or Hispanics supporting Mexico’s “reconquesta” of parts of the United States of America.
The ugly truth is that most Democrats, compromising Republicans, many
minority members and feminists have evolved into the evils they publicly oppose. The irony in a term these folks can understand: ironic karma when you become the evil you hate.
Conservatives have got to get over their obsessions with being popular in
contemporary times. Conservatives have the right to respond or defend themselves from lies or threats from politics of hate.
Example one, if I was a racist, why would I raise issues due to porous borders of illegal immigrants committing crimes against mostly American Hispanic citizens? One of the greatest collections of accessories to murders, sexual tortures, kidnappings, extortions, robberies, and injuries and deaths caused by illegal immigrants to American Hispanic citizens are Rio Grande Valley, Texas residents and local, state, and national politicians opposing the national security border fence.
For the best examples of the worst among Texans, visit South Texas and observe community leaders, most elected officials, most not all business leaders, public educators especially at college level, and majority of general population. Do not forget to listen and watch electronic news media which are defending porous borders due to advertisements generated from collateral retail profits from criminal activities.
The quickest way to spot the America last any sin for a dollar crowd currently running border communities like the Rio Grande Valley, simple just look for the blood on their hands.
A much shorter and infinitely better example to remind contemporary conservatives of importance of popularity would be Jesus, Joan of Arc, Luther, America’s Founding Fathers, and President Jackson who were all not role models for popularity in their respective contemporary times.
Opponents of free will accountability fail, or refuse to comprehend that it was not their Marxist socialism, fascist socialism or money lender philosophies that made America history’s greatest nation.
First riddle just for you, why are so many conservatives who are living beneficiaries of America’s free will traditions; so quick to compromise or too embarrassed to defend liberties which gave them the right to be right? Answer, I know the answer, but feel that letting you interpret it in your own way will be an educational free will process.
Second riddle just for you, how can Chamberlain McCain garner votes from Marxist Democrats by out democrating democrats? Answer: Amendment I of the Bill of Rights includes “freedom of speech”. Conservatives can interpret this to mean that all citizens are entitled by the Constitution to free speech which can be guaranteed by issuing all citizens cell phone stamps. It does not seem compassionate for citizens to have to use credit cards to finance their free speech rights.
Third riddle just for you, was riddle number two satire?
