New Year’s Resolution 2009
Will make this writing exercise brief so you can return to your holiday activities, potential 2009 New Year’s resolution for conservatives, learn to identify, and avoid honoring counterfeit conservatives in both your public and private lives.
First group of counterfeit conservatives to identify and not honor in one’s public and private lives: anti-conservative aristocrats like Bush II, McCain, Texas Senators Hutchinson and Cornyn, Texas Governor Perry, and most Republican elected officials.
Anti conservative aristocrats masquerading as conservatives delivered Germany to Hitler and will Deliver America to Obama; recent example how both Republican Presidential candidate McCain and President Bush II have raced to be Obama’s lap dogs.
Second group of counterfeit conservatives to identify and not honor: populist conservatives whose beliefs drift with ratings. Conservative doctrines are based on principles not fluctuating principals defined by profit margins.
Two good examples, talk show host who openly denounces any ideology and endorses public populism. Fox Network unlike other major networks though not driven by socialism seems driven by mob rule ratings.
Third group of counterfeit conservatives to identify and not honor: those who are conservative for their public audiences, and who knows what in their private lives. Ben Franklin completely and permanently disavowed his relationship with his son when his son supported England during America’s War for Independence.
Question audience members have right to ask Limbaugh and other similar motivated talk show hosts: you claim publicly to be a conservative; however in your private life you socialize with and count as a friend Bush II who is poster child for counterfeit conservatives who has probably violated every promise made to Republican voting base responsible for Bush II being elected.
Limbaugh has right be make a living promoting conservative beliefs; listeners have right to know if he is a “hired gun” in it for money. Most would still respect him for his honesty and his skills as a hired gun rather than his pretending to be something he and others like him my not be, both public and private conservative.
A closing thought for public and private conservatives remember hard times are often Heaven’s way of preparing not punishing.
Wednesday, December 24, 2008
Monday, December 15, 2008
Continue Plus 105
Conservative Environment Standards
Marshall's Law Town Hall Entry 020
Never complaining only explaining, being a Texas licensed surveillance instructor, perhaps an instructional writing exercise would be a good way to ease back into contemporary history writing exercises.
Conservative Environment Standards
This lesson starts with a few definitions. First: conserve, process of preserving in safe or sound state. Second: conservative, philosophy to process of conserving. Third: conservation: careful preservation and protection of something like environment. Antonym: environmentalists “green” campaign subtlety advocating fascism known as Greenism.
Standards are determined to be in compliance by non-prejudicial investigations. Following writing exercise offers techniques conservatives can use to determine environment conservation standards investigations.
Ideals of life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness are directly related to quality of environment. It is hard to live with contaminated air, land, or water. It is difficult to pursue happiness when a polluted environment forces citizens to remain indoors all the time.
It is also unlikely that freedom can be achieved when nature's classrooms are lost due to greed or incompetence. What was it Moses said, “God placed the man in the Garden of Eden as its gardener, to tend and care for it.”
Conserving and preserving a nation's natural resources for future generations is next to freedom, the greatest gift citizens can provide future generations. This objective can be achieved with proper management of private and public parks and reserves.
Success can be measured by amount of time one has to appreciate; enjoy; and learn from natures' resources, processes, and marvelous wonders. After all, a house is simply a tent with too much starch.
Some suggest that anti-species or anti-social behavior rates are partially determined by population density to territory per unit ratios. Due to increased population pressures, natural heritage and resources can only be preserved with private and public regulated areas.
Greatest threats to America's natural heritage and resources are: 1)government neglect; 2)government abuse; 3)government sanctioned pollution or exploitation by special interest groups; 4)government abuse of private citizen's property rights for single species management programs; 5) environmental socialists (environmentalists); and 6) private sector citizens or businesses which neglect, abuse, exploit, or steal any natural resources.
People wishing to further study public sector environmental terrorism at state level, need only examine existing management practices of Texas agencies One, Two, Three, and Four. These public sector environmental terrorist organizations are masters at promoting insignificant volunteer projects while taking bribes which facilitate and protect corporate polluting.
Space; atmosphere; bodies of water; native wildlife (plants and critters); unique terrain and natural wonders are public resources. Private or public actions which mismanage, abuse, damage, or destroy public resources are criminal behavior.
A zoo preserves shell not spirit of natural heritage; zoos are good sources of confined research and public entertainment. Beyond zoos, other environmental management components include public and private sector:
1)"reserves" for the endangered;
2 "preserves" for pre-endangered;
3) refuges and parks;
4) wildlife ranches/farms for reintroduction of plants or animals; and
5) wildlife gardens.
Single species management is a technique suited for farming or ranching (agriculture) not natural resource conservation management. Public management of pre-endangered or endangered species should resemble management practices of game animals. Since private owners can only shoot deer during regulated periods, endangered species would be protected from property owners year round. If private land owners' property is critical for survival of species, land should be purchased by government for a public park, or set aside as a private trust.
Public sector bureaucrats and uninformed non-profit organizations are hurting conservation of natural resources movements by using unconstitutional forces against private citizens and their properties. Government excessive force always offends general public.
It is a myth that only governments and non-profit activists are capable of managing a country's natural resources. Private sector individuals should be included in natural resource management plans.
Good management strategy includes developing conservation environments where surrounding populations benefit financially from co-existence with regulated area.
Additional policy concerns should include prohibiting public sector from selling or leasing non-renewable resources. Contemporary greed which deprives future generations of options to access non-renewable resources is comparable to using children in animal porn films. Renewable resources should only be sold or leased at fair market prices.
Sufficient public funds should be allocated to provide sufficient security for public natural resources. Private funds could be raised to provide security for natural resources in other countries.
Conservative conservationists who do not desire to work and live in a landfill type environment; need to appreciate that adequate environmental resource percentages will always be a topic of debate.
One example, developers in Texas have access to about 98 percent of area's natural resources. If developers cannot make a living on 98 percent of a region's land mass, is remaining 2 percent of undeveloped land going to make these people smarter?
Single species management disrupts natural processes of component bio-tropes or specific ecological systems. Components of specific ecology systems include:
1) geology from the center of earth;
2) surface soils and surrounding water systems;
3) climate and weather;
4) atmosphere;
5) all living plants/creatures (resident and migratory);
6) impacts from surrounding ecological systems.
Specific bio-tropes from million acre plus parks to backyards, should abandon single species management systems for comprehensive component plans based on premise that bio-tropes are evolving not static.
Consider results of following single species plan:
Traps, poisons, and bounties were used to eliminate all predators of young game animals. This activity resulted in a population explosion of rabbits which destroyed native forage for game animals. Game animals eventually became weak, diseased and dead from starvation. Over populated rabbits eventually suffered the same fate as game animals. Foliage barren land washed away in next rainy season.
Many contemporary "weekend environmentalists" are ignorant of nature's processes and natural history. For example, coastal plains along the Gulf of Mexico were covered by prairie grasses and thickets of brush. So why are groups telling public that area's forests need to be replanted, when there hasn't been a "real forest" in this area for thousands of years, if ever?
It also needs to be understood that contemporary concepts surrounding "native habitants" are based on fraud. Key issue is definition of native. Does "native" refer to environmental conditions a hundred years ago; a thousand years ago; or a million years ago?
All habitats are evolutionary, and were only native during their era of conception. Habitats can be defined by their location on an evolutionary time line which excludes human interference. To clarify, one can say that a specific habitat would look like this and contain these components if humans had never interfered in the natural evolutionary process.
Using wood, metal or concrete to build stick forests connected by wires; electric companies have destroyed more miles of American horizons than any other single industry. Perhaps legislation should be enacted requiring these government protected monopolies to continually modernize energy delivery systems. Better still, electric companies which are the best example of government protected dinosaurs; should be forced to compete with private sector alternatives.
Ever wondered why you have never met an unfriendly con artist? The answer is simple, it is easier to con friends; friends tend to give friends the benefit of the doubt; and friends are reluctant to turn friends in to authorities.
These three human conditions give corporate con artists opportunity to start scam; perpetuate scam; and have time to "get away" after scam has run its course. It should be noted that not all corporations operate with criminal mentalities; but sufficient numbers do to justify the following.
Groups generally manipulated by corporate con artists include: poor (unemployed), greedy (local businesses), self serving (local politicians and bureaucrats), and vain (community leaders and local news media).
Community leaders and politicians tend to be vain self admiring publicity seekers who make easy targets for corporate con artists. Careers of these self proclaimed citizen heroes are built on media coverage.
Members of local news media are targeted because these people represent special interest journalists. In reality, small town newspapers generally do not report news that offends "life support" advertisers or fellow chamber members. Consequently, ongoing corporate environmental abuses are never reported unless outside independent journalists take an interest.
Corporate scam, complete with support from local journalists tends to work as follows:
1) corporate representatives contact local community leaders with exaggerated promises of jobs and economic development.
2) the corporation sponsors a series of "getting acquainted" parties involving food, liquor, and in some cases, prostitutes. Purpose of these functions is to show people what a friendly neighbor the corporation will be.
3) corporation makes token contributions and pledges to area charities. One common technique is for the corporation to force employees to sign up for payroll deductions to support area charities. Corporation collects payroll deductions for a year, keeps the money in an interest bearing account; then takes part of interest accrued from employee deductions and gets media credit for corporate gifts.
4) corporation makes contributions to area municipal, county, state, and federal politicians. This effectively buys influence which keeps city, county, state, and federal regulatory agencies from interfering with ongoing corporate pollution. Corporate trick is not to buy government agencies, only lease their indifference for limited amounts of time. This is viable because after the corporation has left area, tax payers will get to clean up mess.
5) corporation seeks and gets special price considerations from local utility companies. Since corporation will be "doing so much good for the community"; it seems only fair that regular utility customers should subsidize corporation by paying higher utility rates.
6) corporation seeks and gets special property and sales tax exemptions. Again, since the corporation will be "doing so much good for the community"; it seems only fair that tax payers should subsidize corporation by paying higher taxes.
7) pays employees lowest possible wages and provide employees with lowest possible benefit packages. Corporate attitude is that communities should be glad somebody cared enough to exploit unemployed.
8) buys surrounding property damaged by corporation production practices so offended parties think that corporation is "fair" to its neighbors.
9) continue rewarding community leaders with token community service gifts so community support for corporation does not diminish, and
10) continues leeching off community resources until environmental damage is so severe that community leaders who have essentially become corporate prostitutes are no longer believable.
Generally by time offended region figures out it have been had; corporation has already found another group of community leaders who can't wait to invite corporation into their neighborhood.
Citizens and communities need to understand that money is not a zero response asset when exchanged in political process. Special interest groups expect policy considerations in return for property. Four standards for evaluating transfer of assets in political process are:
1) impact on national security;
2) impact on constitutional integrity;
3) impact on ethical capitalism; and
4) impact on natural resources.
Penalties imposed of those engaging in environmental terrorism can include: criminal fines; prison time; civil suit damages; or claims against insurance policies or bonds. Any company engaged in actives which impact natural resources that refuses to carry insurance or post bonds, is probably engaging in environmental terrorist activities.
Some ways that communities can protect themselves from transitory marauding corporations are as follows:
1) run complete criminal and financial background checks on inquiring corporation and all of its officers and executives;
2) physically go to last place the corporation left and check following: compare corporate promises to that community; find out if corporation delivered on promises to that community; find out why corporation left that community; and find out if corporation damaged environment of that community;
3) require corporation to maintain a reasonable environmental damage restoration bond. A one hundred million dollar bond should cost corporation about a million dollars a year; the amount of bond should be based on potential risk to potentially affected environmental components (if citizens can be required to have automobile insurance, why can not corporations be required to carry environmental impact insurance), and
4) inform community leaders who collaborate with offending corporations that they will personally make up any financial differences between the corporate environmental damage bond and costs of restoring environment to its original condition from their own resources.
Community leaders, politicians, bureaucrats, and local media currently have no incentive to keep transitory corporations from ruining their surrounding environment. Making these people responsible for letting themselves be conned, will go a long way in protecting the environment. Citizens need to understand that corporations come and go, but communities only have one environment.
Complaints that these accountability policies will drive corporations to other countries are nonsense. Political instability and political corruption will deter any significant corporate flight into third world countries.
Beside that who cares if these corporations take their business elsewhere; transitory corporations who trash environment are collections of human garbage and should not be welcome in any decent neighborhoods.
Corporations often abuse natural resources in following ways:
1) OVER-UTILIZATION: strip mining, over cutting public forests, or commercial aquaculture companies who do not use bed liners which raises the water table in flood prone areas;
2) DUMPING: hazardous liquids, solids, or gases: dumping chemical pollutants from commercial fish, shrimp, or eel ponds into public waters;
3) CHANGING NATURAL PROCESSES: introducing foreign species, and or foreign species diseases into native habitants causing the release of exotic shrimp and eels into pristine public waters when pond banks break during a hurricane;
4) DESTRUCTION OF RESOURCES: killing black bears for their gall bladders, or public agencies selling out to special interests.
Some types of specific pollutants include:
- viruses
- virus anti-biotics
- genetically altered anti-biotic viruses
- non-native parasites
- suspended solids
- non-suspended solids
- dissolved materials
- liquids
- chemicals
- minerals
- non-native animal or plant species
- other substances yet to be identified
Some effected elements of pollution on public waters can include:
- purity (compare to H2o)
- salinity
- turbidity/visibility
- temperature
- erosion
- silting
- oxygen density
- system self flushing capabilities
- native marine\shore plant and animal life
- migratory marine\shore animal life
Laws need to be enacted requiring truth in labeling of public agencies. Perhaps some natural resources conservation commissions should be renamed natural resources vandalism commissions. Such policies would facilitate environmental investigations for conservative conservationists.
This policy would identify agencies like natural resources conservation commissions which: 1)consistently violate private citizens' property rights; 2)implement polices which damage the environment to justify federal "clean up" grants; and 3) take bribes allowing special interest groups to destroy public's natural resources.
Texas agencies One, Two, Three, and Four are comparable to incompetent and very corrupt government agencies in 1800's which used to exploit Native Americans and mismanage Indian reservations. Conservative conservationists would be prudent to never blindly trust government agencies.
Integrity for public sector bureaucrats tends to be guided by loyalty to taxes and grants which pay their salaries; not what is best for America's natural resources.
A great many university "research studies" are propaganda position papers for special interest groups. In many cases, these exercises in fraudulent science threaten domestic well being and national security.
Conservative conservationists who fail to verify or collaborate public sector research studies with independent monitors or independent studies are asking to be victims of scientific fraud.
Conservative conservationists need to understand that many "reputable" environmental groups are fronts for big business interests, “green” groups which take inconsistent stands, or who avoid public positions are likely candidates for being fraudulent community service groups.
Primary clue is always money trail. Community, state, or national conservation groups which oppose low impact environmental threats; but consistently refrain from taking a position on high dollar natural resource destruction projects, are generally covert fronts serving the interests of developers or big business.
Conservative conservationists should be very wary of trusting any elected or appointed official. Most elected officials at every level of government are only loyal to their traditional "fee" driven special interest legislative system; the reality is that integrity is a myth in America's special interest democracies.
Easiest way to stop these types of abuses is to make financial costs of the offending action greater than the financial rewards.
For example, some public natural resources can have "undetermined value" and should be managed as a public trust. If this is not so, why is restoring "diverted" natural resources to their original condition a legitimate tax deductible business expense for private sector profit motivated businesses?
Consequently, both private and public sector organizations which divert natural resources, but who do not pay cost of restoring natural resources to their original condition should be required to report "savings" as income.
Just think how many companies who have engaged in environmental terrorism may owe the government back taxes; or how many municipal, county, or state governing bodies will be required to reimburse federal grant monies.
Conservative conservationists’ best ally in protecting natural resources is private sector civil legal process. Should the civil legal system eventually collapse as the last "by the rules" conservation protection process, final alternative may become civil disobedience.
Conservative conservationists need to understand that using reason or emotional appeal will never stop private and public sector environmental terrorists. Second, private or public justice based on mob rule is always shameless and immoral.
Greatest threats to America’s environment are epidemics introduced by illegal immigrants from third world countries. Even if Americans had never heard word terrorism, southern border would still need to be securely closed to prevent third world epidemics being introduced into America.
Doubters need only review impact of importing foreign flora and fauna on native American plants and animals. Nature is nature and people are influenced by laws of nature.
Many third world infections like tuberculosis are less responsive to treatments for first world tuberculosis. Illegal immigrants do not have reliable histories of completing American treatment programs, actions that produces a third world strain of more lethal and less treatable viruses that produces greater public health threats to Americans.
American politicians, bureaucrats, fools, and special interest hate groups that support a southern porous border will eventually be signing death warrants for millions of American citizens
Justice is a two sided sword. First side is used for resolving intentional or negligent public health threats by terrorists or illegal immigrants. Second side is for bringing Americans too account for unnecessary illnesses, injuries, and deaths.
Need additional references for conservative environment standards for non-prejudicial investigations:
King James Version Genesis 2:15: And the LORD God took the man and put him into the Garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it.
Revised Standard Version Set Forth 1611 A.D. Genesis 2:15: The Lord God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to till it and keep it.
Living Bible Genesis 2:15: The Lord God placed the man in the Garden of Eden as its gardener, to tend and care for it.
Marshall's Law Town Hall Entry 020
Never complaining only explaining, being a Texas licensed surveillance instructor, perhaps an instructional writing exercise would be a good way to ease back into contemporary history writing exercises.
Conservative Environment Standards
This lesson starts with a few definitions. First: conserve, process of preserving in safe or sound state. Second: conservative, philosophy to process of conserving. Third: conservation: careful preservation and protection of something like environment. Antonym: environmentalists “green” campaign subtlety advocating fascism known as Greenism.
Standards are determined to be in compliance by non-prejudicial investigations. Following writing exercise offers techniques conservatives can use to determine environment conservation standards investigations.
Ideals of life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness are directly related to quality of environment. It is hard to live with contaminated air, land, or water. It is difficult to pursue happiness when a polluted environment forces citizens to remain indoors all the time.
It is also unlikely that freedom can be achieved when nature's classrooms are lost due to greed or incompetence. What was it Moses said, “God placed the man in the Garden of Eden as its gardener, to tend and care for it.”
Conserving and preserving a nation's natural resources for future generations is next to freedom, the greatest gift citizens can provide future generations. This objective can be achieved with proper management of private and public parks and reserves.
Success can be measured by amount of time one has to appreciate; enjoy; and learn from natures' resources, processes, and marvelous wonders. After all, a house is simply a tent with too much starch.
Some suggest that anti-species or anti-social behavior rates are partially determined by population density to territory per unit ratios. Due to increased population pressures, natural heritage and resources can only be preserved with private and public regulated areas.
Greatest threats to America's natural heritage and resources are: 1)government neglect; 2)government abuse; 3)government sanctioned pollution or exploitation by special interest groups; 4)government abuse of private citizen's property rights for single species management programs; 5) environmental socialists (environmentalists); and 6) private sector citizens or businesses which neglect, abuse, exploit, or steal any natural resources.
People wishing to further study public sector environmental terrorism at state level, need only examine existing management practices of Texas agencies One, Two, Three, and Four. These public sector environmental terrorist organizations are masters at promoting insignificant volunteer projects while taking bribes which facilitate and protect corporate polluting.
Space; atmosphere; bodies of water; native wildlife (plants and critters); unique terrain and natural wonders are public resources. Private or public actions which mismanage, abuse, damage, or destroy public resources are criminal behavior.
A zoo preserves shell not spirit of natural heritage; zoos are good sources of confined research and public entertainment. Beyond zoos, other environmental management components include public and private sector:
1)"reserves" for the endangered;
2 "preserves" for pre-endangered;
3) refuges and parks;
4) wildlife ranches/farms for reintroduction of plants or animals; and
5) wildlife gardens.
Single species management is a technique suited for farming or ranching (agriculture) not natural resource conservation management. Public management of pre-endangered or endangered species should resemble management practices of game animals. Since private owners can only shoot deer during regulated periods, endangered species would be protected from property owners year round. If private land owners' property is critical for survival of species, land should be purchased by government for a public park, or set aside as a private trust.
Public sector bureaucrats and uninformed non-profit organizations are hurting conservation of natural resources movements by using unconstitutional forces against private citizens and their properties. Government excessive force always offends general public.
It is a myth that only governments and non-profit activists are capable of managing a country's natural resources. Private sector individuals should be included in natural resource management plans.
Good management strategy includes developing conservation environments where surrounding populations benefit financially from co-existence with regulated area.
Additional policy concerns should include prohibiting public sector from selling or leasing non-renewable resources. Contemporary greed which deprives future generations of options to access non-renewable resources is comparable to using children in animal porn films. Renewable resources should only be sold or leased at fair market prices.
Sufficient public funds should be allocated to provide sufficient security for public natural resources. Private funds could be raised to provide security for natural resources in other countries.
Conservative conservationists who do not desire to work and live in a landfill type environment; need to appreciate that adequate environmental resource percentages will always be a topic of debate.
One example, developers in Texas have access to about 98 percent of area's natural resources. If developers cannot make a living on 98 percent of a region's land mass, is remaining 2 percent of undeveloped land going to make these people smarter?
Single species management disrupts natural processes of component bio-tropes or specific ecological systems. Components of specific ecology systems include:
1) geology from the center of earth;
2) surface soils and surrounding water systems;
3) climate and weather;
4) atmosphere;
5) all living plants/creatures (resident and migratory);
6) impacts from surrounding ecological systems.
Specific bio-tropes from million acre plus parks to backyards, should abandon single species management systems for comprehensive component plans based on premise that bio-tropes are evolving not static.
Consider results of following single species plan:
Traps, poisons, and bounties were used to eliminate all predators of young game animals. This activity resulted in a population explosion of rabbits which destroyed native forage for game animals. Game animals eventually became weak, diseased and dead from starvation. Over populated rabbits eventually suffered the same fate as game animals. Foliage barren land washed away in next rainy season.
Many contemporary "weekend environmentalists" are ignorant of nature's processes and natural history. For example, coastal plains along the Gulf of Mexico were covered by prairie grasses and thickets of brush. So why are groups telling public that area's forests need to be replanted, when there hasn't been a "real forest" in this area for thousands of years, if ever?
It also needs to be understood that contemporary concepts surrounding "native habitants" are based on fraud. Key issue is definition of native. Does "native" refer to environmental conditions a hundred years ago; a thousand years ago; or a million years ago?
All habitats are evolutionary, and were only native during their era of conception. Habitats can be defined by their location on an evolutionary time line which excludes human interference. To clarify, one can say that a specific habitat would look like this and contain these components if humans had never interfered in the natural evolutionary process.
Using wood, metal or concrete to build stick forests connected by wires; electric companies have destroyed more miles of American horizons than any other single industry. Perhaps legislation should be enacted requiring these government protected monopolies to continually modernize energy delivery systems. Better still, electric companies which are the best example of government protected dinosaurs; should be forced to compete with private sector alternatives.
Ever wondered why you have never met an unfriendly con artist? The answer is simple, it is easier to con friends; friends tend to give friends the benefit of the doubt; and friends are reluctant to turn friends in to authorities.
These three human conditions give corporate con artists opportunity to start scam; perpetuate scam; and have time to "get away" after scam has run its course. It should be noted that not all corporations operate with criminal mentalities; but sufficient numbers do to justify the following.
Groups generally manipulated by corporate con artists include: poor (unemployed), greedy (local businesses), self serving (local politicians and bureaucrats), and vain (community leaders and local news media).
Community leaders and politicians tend to be vain self admiring publicity seekers who make easy targets for corporate con artists. Careers of these self proclaimed citizen heroes are built on media coverage.
Members of local news media are targeted because these people represent special interest journalists. In reality, small town newspapers generally do not report news that offends "life support" advertisers or fellow chamber members. Consequently, ongoing corporate environmental abuses are never reported unless outside independent journalists take an interest.
Corporate scam, complete with support from local journalists tends to work as follows:
1) corporate representatives contact local community leaders with exaggerated promises of jobs and economic development.
2) the corporation sponsors a series of "getting acquainted" parties involving food, liquor, and in some cases, prostitutes. Purpose of these functions is to show people what a friendly neighbor the corporation will be.
3) corporation makes token contributions and pledges to area charities. One common technique is for the corporation to force employees to sign up for payroll deductions to support area charities. Corporation collects payroll deductions for a year, keeps the money in an interest bearing account; then takes part of interest accrued from employee deductions and gets media credit for corporate gifts.
4) corporation makes contributions to area municipal, county, state, and federal politicians. This effectively buys influence which keeps city, county, state, and federal regulatory agencies from interfering with ongoing corporate pollution. Corporate trick is not to buy government agencies, only lease their indifference for limited amounts of time. This is viable because after the corporation has left area, tax payers will get to clean up mess.
5) corporation seeks and gets special price considerations from local utility companies. Since corporation will be "doing so much good for the community"; it seems only fair that regular utility customers should subsidize corporation by paying higher utility rates.
6) corporation seeks and gets special property and sales tax exemptions. Again, since the corporation will be "doing so much good for the community"; it seems only fair that tax payers should subsidize corporation by paying higher taxes.
7) pays employees lowest possible wages and provide employees with lowest possible benefit packages. Corporate attitude is that communities should be glad somebody cared enough to exploit unemployed.
8) buys surrounding property damaged by corporation production practices so offended parties think that corporation is "fair" to its neighbors.
9) continue rewarding community leaders with token community service gifts so community support for corporation does not diminish, and
10) continues leeching off community resources until environmental damage is so severe that community leaders who have essentially become corporate prostitutes are no longer believable.
Generally by time offended region figures out it have been had; corporation has already found another group of community leaders who can't wait to invite corporation into their neighborhood.
Citizens and communities need to understand that money is not a zero response asset when exchanged in political process. Special interest groups expect policy considerations in return for property. Four standards for evaluating transfer of assets in political process are:
1) impact on national security;
2) impact on constitutional integrity;
3) impact on ethical capitalism; and
4) impact on natural resources.
Penalties imposed of those engaging in environmental terrorism can include: criminal fines; prison time; civil suit damages; or claims against insurance policies or bonds. Any company engaged in actives which impact natural resources that refuses to carry insurance or post bonds, is probably engaging in environmental terrorist activities.
Some ways that communities can protect themselves from transitory marauding corporations are as follows:
1) run complete criminal and financial background checks on inquiring corporation and all of its officers and executives;
2) physically go to last place the corporation left and check following: compare corporate promises to that community; find out if corporation delivered on promises to that community; find out why corporation left that community; and find out if corporation damaged environment of that community;
3) require corporation to maintain a reasonable environmental damage restoration bond. A one hundred million dollar bond should cost corporation about a million dollars a year; the amount of bond should be based on potential risk to potentially affected environmental components (if citizens can be required to have automobile insurance, why can not corporations be required to carry environmental impact insurance), and
4) inform community leaders who collaborate with offending corporations that they will personally make up any financial differences between the corporate environmental damage bond and costs of restoring environment to its original condition from their own resources.
Community leaders, politicians, bureaucrats, and local media currently have no incentive to keep transitory corporations from ruining their surrounding environment. Making these people responsible for letting themselves be conned, will go a long way in protecting the environment. Citizens need to understand that corporations come and go, but communities only have one environment.
Complaints that these accountability policies will drive corporations to other countries are nonsense. Political instability and political corruption will deter any significant corporate flight into third world countries.
Beside that who cares if these corporations take their business elsewhere; transitory corporations who trash environment are collections of human garbage and should not be welcome in any decent neighborhoods.
Corporations often abuse natural resources in following ways:
1) OVER-UTILIZATION: strip mining, over cutting public forests, or commercial aquaculture companies who do not use bed liners which raises the water table in flood prone areas;
2) DUMPING: hazardous liquids, solids, or gases: dumping chemical pollutants from commercial fish, shrimp, or eel ponds into public waters;
3) CHANGING NATURAL PROCESSES: introducing foreign species, and or foreign species diseases into native habitants causing the release of exotic shrimp and eels into pristine public waters when pond banks break during a hurricane;
4) DESTRUCTION OF RESOURCES: killing black bears for their gall bladders, or public agencies selling out to special interests.
Some types of specific pollutants include:
- viruses
- virus anti-biotics
- genetically altered anti-biotic viruses
- non-native parasites
- suspended solids
- non-suspended solids
- dissolved materials
- liquids
- chemicals
- minerals
- non-native animal or plant species
- other substances yet to be identified
Some effected elements of pollution on public waters can include:
- purity (compare to H2o)
- salinity
- turbidity/visibility
- temperature
- erosion
- silting
- oxygen density
- system self flushing capabilities
- native marine\shore plant and animal life
- migratory marine\shore animal life
Laws need to be enacted requiring truth in labeling of public agencies. Perhaps some natural resources conservation commissions should be renamed natural resources vandalism commissions. Such policies would facilitate environmental investigations for conservative conservationists.
This policy would identify agencies like natural resources conservation commissions which: 1)consistently violate private citizens' property rights; 2)implement polices which damage the environment to justify federal "clean up" grants; and 3) take bribes allowing special interest groups to destroy public's natural resources.
Texas agencies One, Two, Three, and Four are comparable to incompetent and very corrupt government agencies in 1800's which used to exploit Native Americans and mismanage Indian reservations. Conservative conservationists would be prudent to never blindly trust government agencies.
Integrity for public sector bureaucrats tends to be guided by loyalty to taxes and grants which pay their salaries; not what is best for America's natural resources.
A great many university "research studies" are propaganda position papers for special interest groups. In many cases, these exercises in fraudulent science threaten domestic well being and national security.
Conservative conservationists who fail to verify or collaborate public sector research studies with independent monitors or independent studies are asking to be victims of scientific fraud.
Conservative conservationists need to understand that many "reputable" environmental groups are fronts for big business interests, “green” groups which take inconsistent stands, or who avoid public positions are likely candidates for being fraudulent community service groups.
Primary clue is always money trail. Community, state, or national conservation groups which oppose low impact environmental threats; but consistently refrain from taking a position on high dollar natural resource destruction projects, are generally covert fronts serving the interests of developers or big business.
Conservative conservationists should be very wary of trusting any elected or appointed official. Most elected officials at every level of government are only loyal to their traditional "fee" driven special interest legislative system; the reality is that integrity is a myth in America's special interest democracies.
Easiest way to stop these types of abuses is to make financial costs of the offending action greater than the financial rewards.
For example, some public natural resources can have "undetermined value" and should be managed as a public trust. If this is not so, why is restoring "diverted" natural resources to their original condition a legitimate tax deductible business expense for private sector profit motivated businesses?
Consequently, both private and public sector organizations which divert natural resources, but who do not pay cost of restoring natural resources to their original condition should be required to report "savings" as income.
Just think how many companies who have engaged in environmental terrorism may owe the government back taxes; or how many municipal, county, or state governing bodies will be required to reimburse federal grant monies.
Conservative conservationists’ best ally in protecting natural resources is private sector civil legal process. Should the civil legal system eventually collapse as the last "by the rules" conservation protection process, final alternative may become civil disobedience.
Conservative conservationists need to understand that using reason or emotional appeal will never stop private and public sector environmental terrorists. Second, private or public justice based on mob rule is always shameless and immoral.
Greatest threats to America’s environment are epidemics introduced by illegal immigrants from third world countries. Even if Americans had never heard word terrorism, southern border would still need to be securely closed to prevent third world epidemics being introduced into America.
Doubters need only review impact of importing foreign flora and fauna on native American plants and animals. Nature is nature and people are influenced by laws of nature.
Many third world infections like tuberculosis are less responsive to treatments for first world tuberculosis. Illegal immigrants do not have reliable histories of completing American treatment programs, actions that produces a third world strain of more lethal and less treatable viruses that produces greater public health threats to Americans.
American politicians, bureaucrats, fools, and special interest hate groups that support a southern porous border will eventually be signing death warrants for millions of American citizens
Justice is a two sided sword. First side is used for resolving intentional or negligent public health threats by terrorists or illegal immigrants. Second side is for bringing Americans too account for unnecessary illnesses, injuries, and deaths.
Need additional references for conservative environment standards for non-prejudicial investigations:
King James Version Genesis 2:15: And the LORD God took the man and put him into the Garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it.
Revised Standard Version Set Forth 1611 A.D. Genesis 2:15: The Lord God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to till it and keep it.
Living Bible Genesis 2:15: The Lord God placed the man in the Garden of Eden as its gardener, to tend and care for it.
Continue Plus 104
World's Shortest Novel
Marshall's Law Town Hall Entry 019
Entry 019
Still explaining not complaining, almost rested for a new writing exercise depicting contemporary history. Another question, is it wrong to exploit those beyond redemption as punishment for entertainment? Seems greatest temptation would be becoming evil one hates. Guess that is a free will decision left to you reading this writing exercise.
World’s Shortest Novel
Players:
Rene - beautiful woman who loves being abused
Richard – man who treats loyalty with honor
Story:
Rene was rich and paltry; Richard was poor and happy. Rene never learned to respect herself.
Moral of Story: Reason or begging are complete waste of time for individuals too blanked up too know they are blanked up.
Marshall's Law Town Hall Entry 019
Entry 019
Still explaining not complaining, almost rested for a new writing exercise depicting contemporary history. Another question, is it wrong to exploit those beyond redemption as punishment for entertainment? Seems greatest temptation would be becoming evil one hates. Guess that is a free will decision left to you reading this writing exercise.
World’s Shortest Novel
Players:
Rene - beautiful woman who loves being abused
Richard – man who treats loyalty with honor
Story:
Rene was rich and paltry; Richard was poor and happy. Rene never learned to respect herself.
Moral of Story: Reason or begging are complete waste of time for individuals too blanked up too know they are blanked up.
Continue Plus 103
Lost Good Years
Marshall's Law Town Hall Entry 018
Explaining not complaining, still not ready to practice writing exercises documenting contemporary history.
Difference between conservatives and liberals who change integrity as situations change. Conservatives describe oath breaking betrayal of Camelot’s love triangle behavior as “dogs in heat”; while those beyond redemption justify dogs in heat as selfish entitlement. One reason Democrats apparently like being fools is their devotion to building Camelot so they can destroy it with decadent promiscuity.
Concepts for further thought, since Heaven not citizens saves souls of sinners; does oath to defend Constitution include coming to aid or defending those threatening Constitution and Bill of Rights? Second, are some betrayal sins beyond forgiveness and best remembered as life lessons or lost good years?
“Lost good years” that seems like a good title for prose based on recent experience. Death of love like death of a good life, can only made easier by time.
Lost Good Years
Prologue: Daymares, nightmares, either or both offer relief from conscious memories; especially for people who's fate does not include making it to promise land. Some know my meaning, bad days get worse; rare good days turn too. If life were fair, there would be no addicts, sinners, or lost good years.
Assignment seemed simple enough line up ducks for a two vehicle multiple fatality traffic accident. For this case putting ducks in a row included:
1. Photograph, diagram, measure accident scene;
2. Photograph and check out vehicles, purchase both wrecks if possible and place in locked storage;
3. Interview witnesses and survivors, no survivors in this case;
4. Pick up copies of all records, documents, and news reports;
5. Conduct necessary background checks;
6. Pursue other related leads.
My original reason for entering any investigation area after dark has long been forgotten. Perhaps one learns about character of a community by quality of its night people.
It was almost two forty five in the morning when I headed for a vacant corner booth near a side door in South Texas used to be franchise fast food restaurant. Word restaurant should be in quotations.
After ordering breakfast special, I headed to washroom. What first caught my attention was an illegal immigrant using water base paint to cover up blood spatter and pellet holes above and all around plywood covering a hole in floor where a toilet used to sit.
In an almost satirical way, number four shot outlined area where toilet's last patron sat. As for the illegal, he just smiled and said I know nothing.
This investigator was almost tempted after washing up to ask the illegal colonist if he knew anything about trading oil base paint for water base paint with a refund.
Oh well, not my investigation; hope that's not cook's profile on wall. As for my waitress, she probably looked vigorous about ten years ago when she was in her teens. Who cares as long as service is almost good?
Experience tells me that waitress's worn out too soon body has a better heart than chamber of commerce strumpets that marry for money. Unfortunately, most of both do not know difference between a lightning bug and a shooting star.
While returning to my booth, I started scanning premise patrons. After sitting in my northwest corner booth, layout from right to left was as follows:
Corner booth directly across room, sat a chamber of commerce suit with his boy toy engaged in an unhappy animated conversation I am glad I could not hear.
Skipping two booths along wall were three stoned juveniles. One probably a drop out with his friendly sixteen year old girl friend; both scheming to ignore their awkward out of place friend who just happened to be their ride.
Moving down center isle of booths was a thirty looking forty year old bar prostitute working her sixty old client. Woman had probably been warned by some social worker or cop about leaving her kids alone as she had them with her while working.
Her twelve year old boy must not have liked watching his mother work as he kept getting up and getting unnecessary refills.
The small for her age ten year old girl, who was already wearing makeup and dressing like her mother constantly watched and listened for every sound and move her mother was making.
All the while the old man was oblivious to kids and was getting most for his investment.
Skip a booth and their were two way overweight not cheaply dressed women talking disparagingly about ugly skinny whores in the last bar they worked that kept them from going home with their true loves.
Skip one booth and directly to my left were two middle age over weight soccer dads wearing youth baseball coach uniforms. Both of their conversations were directed towards people who weren't even at their booth.
One kept trying to sell other on investing is some get rich insurance scheme; while other kept whining about politics of being chosen a youth baseball all stars coach.
As for me, I was still waiting for waitress to bring syrup instead of ketchup for my waffles.
Glancing into parking lot, I noticed a druggie putting a small revolver in his jacket while positioning a looked to be stolen bicycle. My first thought was maybe he will get nervous, loose his nerve or at least wait until I've finish breakfast and leave, before starting some ill fated robbery.
Amazing luck, shortly after potential robber stepped inside; two missionary girls came in and started offering to save souls for donations.
Eventually I got my syrup, finished, and left. Perhaps I should have tipped the missionary as she kept bicycle robber occupied till I left for a less entertaining hotel room.
It took almost two days to line up ducks one, two, and four. You the reader can review first paragraph of this dream to remember what I'm referring too.
Moving on, I was now ready to contact case's only witness. Driver behind the driver who failed to yield right of way that apparently caused accident.
Witness's words were clear and concise: Old man pulled up to stop sign, and came to a complete stop. He looked left; then turned and looked to right. He was looking straight at on coming van when he pulled right out in front of them. It was almost like it he didn't see van's lights. I'll never forget how time slowed as van exploded when it hit that old man. Next came, horrible smell of burning screaming victims. It all happened at once so there was no way I could help.
Witness voluntarily allowed me to notarize his statement; a declaration that subtlety raised question, did old man commit suicide?
My next stop would be with old man's preferably best friend or at least those who could or would talk about old man's mental condition.
Some investigators never learn easiest way to find out what witnesses know is to keep quiet and let them ramble. Old driver's best friend proved to be a career-remembering spectator.
That six foot stringy weathered decaying man appeared to have seen too much truth for anybody's short ninety years. His hands looked like they had spent a lifetime partnership with sailing ships or cattle ranches.
Still this individual did not need to be gruff as his appearance suggested he could be leaning up against a bar with a beer in one hand, and resolve problems without spilling a drop of his hard earned beer.
I informed the old driver's best friend that I was not trying to prove suicide, only figure out what happened.
Measured response by my career-remembering spectator: You don't know much about being old in America do you? I know you do not, so no need to answer.
I have a lot to recall would you like a cold beverage? Without hesitating, old driver's best friend continued. Sarita bring my guest and your boss two tall Crown on rocks. Sweet Sarita, there's a story you would probably find more interesting. She needs a place to live, and I need someone to drive me around ranch; so we both tolerate each other. Forty years ago I could have fallen in love with a woman like Sarita, just never had time or money. Now I have money there's not enough time.
My worthless family has started pretending to be nice hoping that I will leave them ranch and cash reserves. Those virtual ethical ant people are sure going to be surprised upon learning that Sarita won my death's lottery.
Don't reveal my secret, Sarita does not know and I want to claim last good turn in our relationship.
Now for your reason for being here, old driver as you call him was not suicidal case closed. Let tell you about his living experiences.
Old driver worked for same company for twenty - nine years eleven months and nineteen days before being down sized for out sourcing that meant he fell eleven days short of a full pension.
Next arrived news that corporate cartel had gotten involved in some Enron type scheme, and lost all of old driver's retirement savings and investments.
Bad news often travels in packs, as his wife's lost her health insurance because her predisposition to breast cancer raised her employer's benefit package premiums above company employment limits.
Wife while under going tests at a local hospital suffered an infection caused by improperly sterilized medical equipment. Medical centers generated infections have become one of greatest threats to older Americans needing medical attention.
After totally destroying his wife's long-term health, hospital evicted old driver from a home he and his wife had lived in for almost sixty years. Why, in lieu of paying hospital bills incurred as a result of his wife's hospital induced infection.
Next the old driver learned that only way to qualify for nursing home care for his wife who would soon be in a coma was to sell his and his wife's wedding rings which had over sixty years appreciated in value beyond the government's minimum assets limits.
It broke that old driver's heart to take back the ring he had given his bride on best day of his life. Sometime during that night the old driver's wife slipped into a coma. Old man’s suffering never seem to end as the old driver had to find part time work to buy prescription medicines to keep his wife's unconscious state pain free.
Sarita, two more Crowns on ice, for my guest and your boss.
It is Republican Party policies designed to force old people into poverty that causes some of us citizens to not think highly of Republicans. The problem with Republicans is that they have never learned that with power comes
accountability.
Any political party that controls executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government at same time is solely responsible for bad government policies. Have you ever seen movies where Nazi prison guards rip wedding rings and family heirlooms away from old women waiting to be shipped to concentration camps? Don't answer. I know you have.
What is difference in American polices which force old people to sell their rings, heirlooms, mementos, and give proceeds to government before being eligible for health care? Best I can tell the only difference is American politicians with thieving personalities do no have courage to wear uniforms. Do you know why I quit voting for Republicans after seventy years; don't try to answer, you cannot possibly know.
Republican Party has been hijacked by soul less anti conservative aristocrats motivated by unethical capitalism.
Dishonest capitalism always evolves into corporate feudalism, a polite phrase for special interest fascism. Republican leadership has become evil socialists they used to hate. Old men nearing end of their lives can say what they like: truth be known, it is doubtful that leaders of either Republican or Democratic Party are worthy of being buried in American soil.
Back to something you can use, what caused the old driver to see and not register on coming traffic. Background, companies do not offer full time jobs with benefits to men over fifty-five. Republicans will say this is not true, but they are generally ones not offering these jobs to blue or white-collar private sector middle class men.
Only available jobs for older American men are part time, minimum wage, no benefits hazardous work environments with competition from criminal immigrants and illegal immigrants.
Aristocratic Republicans have betrayed America's middle class by providing public sector full coverage no cost health benefits to illegal colonists.
Additionally ignoring foreign laborers working for less than minimum wage essentially excludes American's retired from part time employment markets. Government itself is guilty of promoting poverty to make people dependent on government. Six dollars an hour after government deductions barely nets worker five dollars an hour. A thirty hour a week part time job nets the older worker about one hundred fifty dollars a week; not enough to cover supplemental health insurance premiums.
As for hazardous working environments, this is the good part. Companies know that hiring old men with pre-existing age created health conditions reduces civil exposure to hazardous working environments. I'll guess the old driver's autopsy showed no signs of alcohol, drugs, or prescription medications.
Old driver worked part time cleaning concrete by spraying chemicals with warning labels advised only be applied when wearing protective clothing and using self contained breathing respirators.
Unfortunately old driver's employer stored chemicals in open containers in high temperature work environments and provided no safety equipment. Chemicals you need to be testing old man's blood, tissues, and brain for are: phosphoric acid, sulfuric acid, hydrofluoric acid, and mercury.
I don't know what mercury was for, but I do know the old driver told me that these chemicals were only deleted with twenty percent water when being applied. The old driver also told me that chemicals were giving him severe head and muscle aches along with black outs. To answer your last question, he had to keep working to buy his wife's painkillers for her unconscious state.
It is time for Sarita to drive me around ranch. Sarita bring me five-gallon bucket in plastic bag you are never allowed to touch for my guest and your boss. Old driver brought me bucket after it was thrown in trash at one of his job sites.
Let me wrap this up while we are waiting for Sarita: life includes unjust irony. What would you call it when generation that survived Great Depression, won World War II, rebuilt Europe and Asia, put men on moon, won Cold War without blowing up planet, and produced wealthiest republic in history; would be robbed into poverty and abandoned to nursing homes by benefactors of their generation's successes.
Entire time I was thanking old driver's best friend for his time and help; I didn't know if I was more grateful for information, or that is was time for Sarita to take the spectator for his ride. Being honest, don't think I could have held up to another tall Crown on rocks.
Some more ducks to line up:
1) Order additional chemical residue tests on old driver;
2) Surveillance footage of identical chemical container being dumped in trash by company employee and get bucket from garbage truck driver;
3) File report and ship evidence to client; and
4) Other activities as needed.
This dream is not quite over. I am not especially superstitious, but I always enjoy listening to my favorite Emerald Stars tape in route to my next assignment.
A fed looking SUV with grill flashers pulled me over just past city limits marker. Not wanting to get jammed in my vehicle, I immediately stepped out with my micro cassette recording and my concealed carry in place.
I recognized the driver from my first stop in town. He asked if I were the investigator working the multiple fatality accident. He was politely apprised that who, I worked for was none of his business.
This concerned community leader demanded I give him five-gallon bucket I had gotten from garbage man.
He was informed that I paid cash for bucket and that all sales are final. Plus I couldn't turn over bucket if I wanted too, since it had already been air expressed to its new owner.
Changing direction of conversation, I notified community leader that I wanted to thank him for lining up my last duck: I would not have known you knew how bad the risks were until you made an issue over one empty plastic bucket.
Typical response, He said that he had broken no criminal laws or had any civil liability exposure.
Felt I was taking control and decided to do a little demoralizing: I have heard, that right before people die their life flashes before their eyes.
Also been told that right before good people die, their best hopes and best memories flash before their eyes; however, when it comes to bad people, it is their greatest fears and most horrible memories that flash before their eyes.
Guess questions you need to answer; if your chemicals affected old driver's reflexes, does that make you one of the bad guys?
If old driver lost good years because of way you manage your employees, does that make you one of bad guys? Sure don't need to know what flashes before your eyes.
Not much else to say, I got back in my vehicle and left. Next assignment seemed simple enough, line up ducks for a one vehicle one fatality.
Marshall's Law Town Hall Entry 018
Explaining not complaining, still not ready to practice writing exercises documenting contemporary history.
Difference between conservatives and liberals who change integrity as situations change. Conservatives describe oath breaking betrayal of Camelot’s love triangle behavior as “dogs in heat”; while those beyond redemption justify dogs in heat as selfish entitlement. One reason Democrats apparently like being fools is their devotion to building Camelot so they can destroy it with decadent promiscuity.
Concepts for further thought, since Heaven not citizens saves souls of sinners; does oath to defend Constitution include coming to aid or defending those threatening Constitution and Bill of Rights? Second, are some betrayal sins beyond forgiveness and best remembered as life lessons or lost good years?
“Lost good years” that seems like a good title for prose based on recent experience. Death of love like death of a good life, can only made easier by time.
Lost Good Years
Prologue: Daymares, nightmares, either or both offer relief from conscious memories; especially for people who's fate does not include making it to promise land. Some know my meaning, bad days get worse; rare good days turn too. If life were fair, there would be no addicts, sinners, or lost good years.
Assignment seemed simple enough line up ducks for a two vehicle multiple fatality traffic accident. For this case putting ducks in a row included:
1. Photograph, diagram, measure accident scene;
2. Photograph and check out vehicles, purchase both wrecks if possible and place in locked storage;
3. Interview witnesses and survivors, no survivors in this case;
4. Pick up copies of all records, documents, and news reports;
5. Conduct necessary background checks;
6. Pursue other related leads.
My original reason for entering any investigation area after dark has long been forgotten. Perhaps one learns about character of a community by quality of its night people.
It was almost two forty five in the morning when I headed for a vacant corner booth near a side door in South Texas used to be franchise fast food restaurant. Word restaurant should be in quotations.
After ordering breakfast special, I headed to washroom. What first caught my attention was an illegal immigrant using water base paint to cover up blood spatter and pellet holes above and all around plywood covering a hole in floor where a toilet used to sit.
In an almost satirical way, number four shot outlined area where toilet's last patron sat. As for the illegal, he just smiled and said I know nothing.
This investigator was almost tempted after washing up to ask the illegal colonist if he knew anything about trading oil base paint for water base paint with a refund.
Oh well, not my investigation; hope that's not cook's profile on wall. As for my waitress, she probably looked vigorous about ten years ago when she was in her teens. Who cares as long as service is almost good?
Experience tells me that waitress's worn out too soon body has a better heart than chamber of commerce strumpets that marry for money. Unfortunately, most of both do not know difference between a lightning bug and a shooting star.
While returning to my booth, I started scanning premise patrons. After sitting in my northwest corner booth, layout from right to left was as follows:
Corner booth directly across room, sat a chamber of commerce suit with his boy toy engaged in an unhappy animated conversation I am glad I could not hear.
Skipping two booths along wall were three stoned juveniles. One probably a drop out with his friendly sixteen year old girl friend; both scheming to ignore their awkward out of place friend who just happened to be their ride.
Moving down center isle of booths was a thirty looking forty year old bar prostitute working her sixty old client. Woman had probably been warned by some social worker or cop about leaving her kids alone as she had them with her while working.
Her twelve year old boy must not have liked watching his mother work as he kept getting up and getting unnecessary refills.
The small for her age ten year old girl, who was already wearing makeup and dressing like her mother constantly watched and listened for every sound and move her mother was making.
All the while the old man was oblivious to kids and was getting most for his investment.
Skip a booth and their were two way overweight not cheaply dressed women talking disparagingly about ugly skinny whores in the last bar they worked that kept them from going home with their true loves.
Skip one booth and directly to my left were two middle age over weight soccer dads wearing youth baseball coach uniforms. Both of their conversations were directed towards people who weren't even at their booth.
One kept trying to sell other on investing is some get rich insurance scheme; while other kept whining about politics of being chosen a youth baseball all stars coach.
As for me, I was still waiting for waitress to bring syrup instead of ketchup for my waffles.
Glancing into parking lot, I noticed a druggie putting a small revolver in his jacket while positioning a looked to be stolen bicycle. My first thought was maybe he will get nervous, loose his nerve or at least wait until I've finish breakfast and leave, before starting some ill fated robbery.
Amazing luck, shortly after potential robber stepped inside; two missionary girls came in and started offering to save souls for donations.
Eventually I got my syrup, finished, and left. Perhaps I should have tipped the missionary as she kept bicycle robber occupied till I left for a less entertaining hotel room.
It took almost two days to line up ducks one, two, and four. You the reader can review first paragraph of this dream to remember what I'm referring too.
Moving on, I was now ready to contact case's only witness. Driver behind the driver who failed to yield right of way that apparently caused accident.
Witness's words were clear and concise: Old man pulled up to stop sign, and came to a complete stop. He looked left; then turned and looked to right. He was looking straight at on coming van when he pulled right out in front of them. It was almost like it he didn't see van's lights. I'll never forget how time slowed as van exploded when it hit that old man. Next came, horrible smell of burning screaming victims. It all happened at once so there was no way I could help.
Witness voluntarily allowed me to notarize his statement; a declaration that subtlety raised question, did old man commit suicide?
My next stop would be with old man's preferably best friend or at least those who could or would talk about old man's mental condition.
Some investigators never learn easiest way to find out what witnesses know is to keep quiet and let them ramble. Old driver's best friend proved to be a career-remembering spectator.
That six foot stringy weathered decaying man appeared to have seen too much truth for anybody's short ninety years. His hands looked like they had spent a lifetime partnership with sailing ships or cattle ranches.
Still this individual did not need to be gruff as his appearance suggested he could be leaning up against a bar with a beer in one hand, and resolve problems without spilling a drop of his hard earned beer.
I informed the old driver's best friend that I was not trying to prove suicide, only figure out what happened.
Measured response by my career-remembering spectator: You don't know much about being old in America do you? I know you do not, so no need to answer.
I have a lot to recall would you like a cold beverage? Without hesitating, old driver's best friend continued. Sarita bring my guest and your boss two tall Crown on rocks. Sweet Sarita, there's a story you would probably find more interesting. She needs a place to live, and I need someone to drive me around ranch; so we both tolerate each other. Forty years ago I could have fallen in love with a woman like Sarita, just never had time or money. Now I have money there's not enough time.
My worthless family has started pretending to be nice hoping that I will leave them ranch and cash reserves. Those virtual ethical ant people are sure going to be surprised upon learning that Sarita won my death's lottery.
Don't reveal my secret, Sarita does not know and I want to claim last good turn in our relationship.
Now for your reason for being here, old driver as you call him was not suicidal case closed. Let tell you about his living experiences.
Old driver worked for same company for twenty - nine years eleven months and nineteen days before being down sized for out sourcing that meant he fell eleven days short of a full pension.
Next arrived news that corporate cartel had gotten involved in some Enron type scheme, and lost all of old driver's retirement savings and investments.
Bad news often travels in packs, as his wife's lost her health insurance because her predisposition to breast cancer raised her employer's benefit package premiums above company employment limits.
Wife while under going tests at a local hospital suffered an infection caused by improperly sterilized medical equipment. Medical centers generated infections have become one of greatest threats to older Americans needing medical attention.
After totally destroying his wife's long-term health, hospital evicted old driver from a home he and his wife had lived in for almost sixty years. Why, in lieu of paying hospital bills incurred as a result of his wife's hospital induced infection.
Next the old driver learned that only way to qualify for nursing home care for his wife who would soon be in a coma was to sell his and his wife's wedding rings which had over sixty years appreciated in value beyond the government's minimum assets limits.
It broke that old driver's heart to take back the ring he had given his bride on best day of his life. Sometime during that night the old driver's wife slipped into a coma. Old man’s suffering never seem to end as the old driver had to find part time work to buy prescription medicines to keep his wife's unconscious state pain free.
Sarita, two more Crowns on ice, for my guest and your boss.
It is Republican Party policies designed to force old people into poverty that causes some of us citizens to not think highly of Republicans. The problem with Republicans is that they have never learned that with power comes
accountability.
Any political party that controls executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government at same time is solely responsible for bad government policies. Have you ever seen movies where Nazi prison guards rip wedding rings and family heirlooms away from old women waiting to be shipped to concentration camps? Don't answer. I know you have.
What is difference in American polices which force old people to sell their rings, heirlooms, mementos, and give proceeds to government before being eligible for health care? Best I can tell the only difference is American politicians with thieving personalities do no have courage to wear uniforms. Do you know why I quit voting for Republicans after seventy years; don't try to answer, you cannot possibly know.
Republican Party has been hijacked by soul less anti conservative aristocrats motivated by unethical capitalism.
Dishonest capitalism always evolves into corporate feudalism, a polite phrase for special interest fascism. Republican leadership has become evil socialists they used to hate. Old men nearing end of their lives can say what they like: truth be known, it is doubtful that leaders of either Republican or Democratic Party are worthy of being buried in American soil.
Back to something you can use, what caused the old driver to see and not register on coming traffic. Background, companies do not offer full time jobs with benefits to men over fifty-five. Republicans will say this is not true, but they are generally ones not offering these jobs to blue or white-collar private sector middle class men.
Only available jobs for older American men are part time, minimum wage, no benefits hazardous work environments with competition from criminal immigrants and illegal immigrants.
Aristocratic Republicans have betrayed America's middle class by providing public sector full coverage no cost health benefits to illegal colonists.
Additionally ignoring foreign laborers working for less than minimum wage essentially excludes American's retired from part time employment markets. Government itself is guilty of promoting poverty to make people dependent on government. Six dollars an hour after government deductions barely nets worker five dollars an hour. A thirty hour a week part time job nets the older worker about one hundred fifty dollars a week; not enough to cover supplemental health insurance premiums.
As for hazardous working environments, this is the good part. Companies know that hiring old men with pre-existing age created health conditions reduces civil exposure to hazardous working environments. I'll guess the old driver's autopsy showed no signs of alcohol, drugs, or prescription medications.
Old driver worked part time cleaning concrete by spraying chemicals with warning labels advised only be applied when wearing protective clothing and using self contained breathing respirators.
Unfortunately old driver's employer stored chemicals in open containers in high temperature work environments and provided no safety equipment. Chemicals you need to be testing old man's blood, tissues, and brain for are: phosphoric acid, sulfuric acid, hydrofluoric acid, and mercury.
I don't know what mercury was for, but I do know the old driver told me that these chemicals were only deleted with twenty percent water when being applied. The old driver also told me that chemicals were giving him severe head and muscle aches along with black outs. To answer your last question, he had to keep working to buy his wife's painkillers for her unconscious state.
It is time for Sarita to drive me around ranch. Sarita bring me five-gallon bucket in plastic bag you are never allowed to touch for my guest and your boss. Old driver brought me bucket after it was thrown in trash at one of his job sites.
Let me wrap this up while we are waiting for Sarita: life includes unjust irony. What would you call it when generation that survived Great Depression, won World War II, rebuilt Europe and Asia, put men on moon, won Cold War without blowing up planet, and produced wealthiest republic in history; would be robbed into poverty and abandoned to nursing homes by benefactors of their generation's successes.
Entire time I was thanking old driver's best friend for his time and help; I didn't know if I was more grateful for information, or that is was time for Sarita to take the spectator for his ride. Being honest, don't think I could have held up to another tall Crown on rocks.
Some more ducks to line up:
1) Order additional chemical residue tests on old driver;
2) Surveillance footage of identical chemical container being dumped in trash by company employee and get bucket from garbage truck driver;
3) File report and ship evidence to client; and
4) Other activities as needed.
This dream is not quite over. I am not especially superstitious, but I always enjoy listening to my favorite Emerald Stars tape in route to my next assignment.
A fed looking SUV with grill flashers pulled me over just past city limits marker. Not wanting to get jammed in my vehicle, I immediately stepped out with my micro cassette recording and my concealed carry in place.
I recognized the driver from my first stop in town. He asked if I were the investigator working the multiple fatality accident. He was politely apprised that who, I worked for was none of his business.
This concerned community leader demanded I give him five-gallon bucket I had gotten from garbage man.
He was informed that I paid cash for bucket and that all sales are final. Plus I couldn't turn over bucket if I wanted too, since it had already been air expressed to its new owner.
Changing direction of conversation, I notified community leader that I wanted to thank him for lining up my last duck: I would not have known you knew how bad the risks were until you made an issue over one empty plastic bucket.
Typical response, He said that he had broken no criminal laws or had any civil liability exposure.
Felt I was taking control and decided to do a little demoralizing: I have heard, that right before people die their life flashes before their eyes.
Also been told that right before good people die, their best hopes and best memories flash before their eyes; however, when it comes to bad people, it is their greatest fears and most horrible memories that flash before their eyes.
Guess questions you need to answer; if your chemicals affected old driver's reflexes, does that make you one of the bad guys?
If old driver lost good years because of way you manage your employees, does that make you one of bad guys? Sure don't need to know what flashes before your eyes.
Not much else to say, I got back in my vehicle and left. Next assignment seemed simple enough, line up ducks for a one vehicle one fatality.
Friday, December 12, 2008
Continue Plus 102
Prosecutor for Constitution
Contemporary history tires this retired old farmer’s son turned
Texas drifter; chosen diversion is writing exercises of non
fiction future history. These lyrical visual prose short stories are
not fiction future history.
Prosecutor for Constitution: “play about United States Texas Senator’s trial for treason”
Author’s Disclaimer: Some write to teach while others write to entertain. Sometimes I write to teach by entertaining. Defendant’s name in Prosecutor For Constitution is John Bornyn. Whether others with similar sounding names are fools or traitors will be judged by future citizen historians.
Intro:
Truth is like bitter medicine for most Americans, and may be administered by sugarcoated entertainment in stories like Prosecutor for Constitution.
Marshall’s Law
Players:
Judge
Prosecutor
Defense Attorney
Defendant
Heavenly Angel Number Five
George Washington
Abraham Lincoln
Contents Note: Reference Documents verify Library Of Congress
Set: Spiritual Court Room
Judge Gabriel (to prosecutor): Why am I not surprised to see that defense attorney from TEXAS ON TRIAL is now working as a prosecutor for United States Constitution.
Prosecutor: Not wishing to waste time in convicting defendant of treason, the prosecution agrees to skip opening remarks and go straight to the evidence.
Prosecutor: Evidence that will prove that the defendant conspired and acted to replace America’s constitutional republic nation state with an internationalist moneylender oligarchy. Oligarchy is defined as a government in which a few exercises control for corrupt and selfish purposes. If the defendant’s treason prevails:
America the nation would cease to exist when national boundaries were replaced with something called the continental perimeter.
America’s Constitution would be replaced with something called North American Cooperative Security Act.
America’s executive, legislative and judicial institutions would become slaves to something called North American Parliamentary Group.
The United States of America would be renamed North American Community.
Prosecutor Continues: I would like to introduce and read a public document citing defendant U.S. Texas Senator John Bornyn’s own words. Prosecution Exhibit Number One, a public document.
Prosecutor walks over and stands behind defendant, and begins to read: North American Investment Act.
Defense Attorney: Objection, to prosecutor reading Exhibit One while standing behind my client.
Prosecutor: moving would only suggest that the defendant was ashamed of his words and guilty of treason, an action on my part that might prejudice the jury and deprive the defendant of due process.
Judge: Mr. Prosecutor, this court respects sincerity and holds cleverness in contempt. Proceed with caution.
Prosecutor: I will begin again.
North American Investment Fund Act (Introduced in Senate)
108th CONGRESS
2d Session
S. 2941
To authorize the President to negotiate the creation of a North American Investment Fund to promote economic and infrastructure integration among Canada, Mexico, and the United States, and for other purposes.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
October 7, 2004
Mr. BORNYN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations
A BILL
To authorize the President to negotiate the creation of a North American Investment Fund to promote economic and infrastructure integration among Canada, Mexico, and the United States, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `North American Investment Fund Act'.
SEC. 2. AUTHORITY FOR A NORTH AMERICAN INVESTMENT FUND.
The President is authorized to negotiate with the Governments of Canada and Mexico to create a North American Investment Fund, as described in this Act (hereinafter referred to as the `Fund'), by--
SEC. 3. PURPOSES.
The purposes of the Fund shall be--
(1) to promote economic and infrastructure integration among Canada, Mexico, and the United States;
(2) to promote education and economic development in Mexico; and
(3) to reduce the wealth gap between Mexico and Canada, and between Mexico and the United States.
SEC. 4. PROJECTS FUNDED.
(a) IN GENERAL- The Fund shall make grants for projects to carry out the purposes described in section 3, including projects--
(1) to construct roads in Mexico to facilitate trade
SEC. 5. CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE FUND.
(a) IN GENERAL- The terms of the agreement establishing the Fund shall, subject to the limitation in subsection (b), require the Governments of Canada, Mexico, and the United States to contribute to the Fund.
Prosecutor: Article III Section3 of the Unites States Constitution declares: Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted or treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act or on confession in open court.
Prosecutor continues: The defendant’s twice reading of the proposed law in public complies with the stipulation of “testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act”.
Before the defense attorney objects, I could subpoena every person on this planet who has seen or heard a tape of the defendant’s words.
Defense Attorney: No objection, defense agrees to the stipulation.
Prosecutor: I would now like to introduce and read excerpts from a public document containing testimony supporting the defendant’s treasonous efforts the defense has stipulated fulfills Constitutional standards for treason.
Judge Interrupts: The stipulation was to allow the twice readings to be witnesses not specific charges.
Prosecutor: You are correct Judge. The defendant’s words are witnesses to the specific act of attempting to replace the United States of America with a new political system known as “North American Community”.
(Prosecutor starts to read.): Prosecutor’s Exhibit Number Two: A public document.
American Community Approach to Security
June 9, 2005
(Edited) Testimony before a hearing of the Subcommittee on the Western
Hemisphere U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee. By vice President
and director of the Center for North American Studies.
As we approach the fourth anniversary of 9/11, it is time for us to step back from our trauma and the border and examine the problem in a broader context. The best way to assure security is not at our borders with Canada and Mexico and not by defining “security” in conventional and narrow terms. We need to think about these issues in the context of a continent that is integrating economically and socially at a rapid rate
What we need to do now is forge a North American Community, based on the premise that each member benefits from its neighbor’s success and is diminished by its problems.
In my statement, I will comment first on the emergence of North America, the next decade’s agenda, and the response by the three governments. Next, I will describe some of the recommendations of the Council Task Force Report and focus on the travel initiative and the security and border issues.
The U.S. Congress should also merge the U.S.-Mexican and U.S.-Canadian inter-parliamentary groups into a single “North American Parliamentary Group.” A third institution should be a “Permanent Tribunal on Trade and Investment.” A permanent court would permit the accumulation of precedent and lay the groundwork for North American business law.
North American governments can learn from the EU’s efforts to establish EU Educational and Research Centers in the United States. Centers for North American Studies in the United States, Canada, and Mexico would help people in all three countries to understand the problems and the potential of an integrated North America— and to think of themselves as North Americans. Scholarships should encourage North American students to study in each other’s country. Until a new consciousness of North America’s promise takes root, many of these proposals will remain impractical.
Perimeter: Instead of creating new obstacles at the border, we should find ways to ease traffic and harmonize safety and transportation obtain a Border Pass, which would be accepted at all border points within North America as a complement to passports.
The U.S., Mexican, and Canadian governments remain zealous defenders of an outdated conception of sovereignty even though their citizens are ready for a new approach. Each nation’s leadership has stressed differences rather than common interests. North America needs leaders who can articulate and pursue a broader vision.
I hope this Committee will pursue the North American agenda beyond the travel initiative considered here. These should be reviewed together with Senator Richard Lugar’s far-sighted bill for a “North American Cooperative Security Act” and Senator Bornyn’s “North American Investment Fund.” The time has come for us to define a true North American Community. (end of document)
Prosecutor: Prosecution for the Constitution’s first witness is Heavenly Angel Number Five.
Prosecutor to Heavenly Angel Number Five: Is there any entity or person who can confirm your identity?
Heavenly Angel Number Five: The Judge.
Judge: This is Heavenly Angel Number Five.
Prosecutor to Heavenly Angel Number Five: Did the defendant take an oath to God and or make a spiritual contract with God to “uphold, protect, and defend” the United States Constitution?
Heavenly Angel Number Five: Yes.
Prosecutor: Is the spirit of the defendant’s oath and or contract consistent with the United States Constitution and Prosecution for Constitution Exhibit Number One?
Heavenly Angel Number Five: No.
Prosecutor: Is the defendant in violation of his oath with God and or has the defendant broken his contract with God.
Heavenly Angel Number Five: Yes
Prosecutor: Based on your spiritual experiences, are individuals who violate oaths or break contracts with God more likely or less likely to engage in treason against their country, their republic, and their republic’s constitution?
Heavenly Angel Number Five: More Likely
Prosecutor: No more questions.
Defense Attorney: No questions. (Whispers to defendant.) Only a fool would challenge the integrity of one of Heaven’s Angels. I’m here to try and save your soul, not lose my mine.
Prosecutor: Prosecution for the U.S. Constitution calls George Washington as the next witness.
Prosecutor: Are you the George Washington who had occasion to be Commander and Chief of America’s Revolutionary forces who won America’s Independence from England, and are you the same George Washington who had occasion to serve as America’s first President?
George Washington: Yes to both questions.
Prosecutor: Mr. President, did you make the following statements in your Farwell Address. The basis of our political system is the right of the people to make and to alter their constitutions of government. But the Constitution which at any time exists, till changed by an explicit and authentic act of the whole people, is sacredly obligatory upon all.
Did you also state in your Farwell Address: It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world. There can be no greater error than to calculate upon real favors from nation to nation. It is an illusion, which experience must cure, which a just pride ought to discard.
George Washington: Yes to both.
Prosecutor to George Washington: Based on your knowledge of original intent of the United Sates Constitution, and your many earthly experiences with international tyrants; would you testify under oath before God himself that Prosecution for Constitution Exhibits One and Two represents words, actions, and associations of a patriot or traitor.
George Washington: Traitor. Traitor.
Defense Attorney: No questions. (Whispers to defendant.) Only a fool would challenge the integrity of George Washington. I’m here to try and save your life, not lose my mine.
Prosecutor: Prosecution for the Constitution calls President Abraham Lincoln to the stand.
Prosecutor: President Lincoln, did you have occasion to serve the United States of America during the 1860’s?
President Lincoln: Yes.
Prosecutor: How many Americans died in your service during your administration trying to uphold, protect and defend America’s Constitution?
President Lincoln: Including civilian casualties, one million plus one.
Prosecutor: That’s right you also died in service of your sacred oath to uphold, protect, and defend the Constitution and Bill of Rights. How does it make you feel when you see elected officials who took the same oath as you died for, creating and supporting documents like Prosecution for the Constitution Exhibits One and Two?
President Lincoln: Breaks my heart to think that all the suffering and sacrifices during our nation’s Civil War, a war between brothers and neighbors was in vain.
Prosecutor: Mr. Lincoln would you consider the defendant’s words and actions to be helpful or harmful to the Constitution you served through death?
President Lincoln: Beyond harmful.
Defense Attorney: Judge, how many more past away witnesses does the Prosecutor intend to call?
Prosecutor: I am prepared to call every past away soul who died defending America’s Constitution. Probably over four million, as for the exact total, your Honor would know that better than me.
Continuing: As for the lying, probably over fifty million who have suffered because of the defendant’s treasonous policies; again, your Honor would better know the exact number better than me.
Judge To Prosecutor: I warned you about being clever.
Prosecutor: With all due respect your honor, my commitment to total due process for the Constitution is about sincerity not being clever.
Judge: Perhaps the Prosecutor and Defense Attorney can reach an agreement that does not involve calling millions and millions of both living and past away witnesses.
Prosecutor Looking At Defendant Then Defense Attorney: Here is your one and only two choice deal.
One, defendant publicly hangs for treason; eternal damnation for defendant’s soul; and perpetual condemnation for defendant’s reputation; or
Two, defendant will be asked for any last words of contrition before he is publicly hanged for treason; the defendant can save his soul from eternal damnation and his reputation from perpetual condemnation by giving Americans names they can curse, despise, and hate more than his.
Prosecutor Looks at Defendant: Your choice traitor.
Defendant Starts To Speak:
Contemporary history tires this retired old farmer’s son turned
Texas drifter; chosen diversion is writing exercises of non
fiction future history. These lyrical visual prose short stories are
not fiction future history.
Prosecutor for Constitution: “play about United States Texas Senator’s trial for treason”
Author’s Disclaimer: Some write to teach while others write to entertain. Sometimes I write to teach by entertaining. Defendant’s name in Prosecutor For Constitution is John Bornyn. Whether others with similar sounding names are fools or traitors will be judged by future citizen historians.
Intro:
Truth is like bitter medicine for most Americans, and may be administered by sugarcoated entertainment in stories like Prosecutor for Constitution.
Marshall’s Law
Players:
Judge
Prosecutor
Defense Attorney
Defendant
Heavenly Angel Number Five
George Washington
Abraham Lincoln
Contents Note: Reference Documents verify Library Of Congress
Set: Spiritual Court Room
Judge Gabriel (to prosecutor): Why am I not surprised to see that defense attorney from TEXAS ON TRIAL is now working as a prosecutor for United States Constitution.
Prosecutor: Not wishing to waste time in convicting defendant of treason, the prosecution agrees to skip opening remarks and go straight to the evidence.
Prosecutor: Evidence that will prove that the defendant conspired and acted to replace America’s constitutional republic nation state with an internationalist moneylender oligarchy. Oligarchy is defined as a government in which a few exercises control for corrupt and selfish purposes. If the defendant’s treason prevails:
America the nation would cease to exist when national boundaries were replaced with something called the continental perimeter.
America’s Constitution would be replaced with something called North American Cooperative Security Act.
America’s executive, legislative and judicial institutions would become slaves to something called North American Parliamentary Group.
The United States of America would be renamed North American Community.
Prosecutor Continues: I would like to introduce and read a public document citing defendant U.S. Texas Senator John Bornyn’s own words. Prosecution Exhibit Number One, a public document.
Prosecutor walks over and stands behind defendant, and begins to read: North American Investment Act.
Defense Attorney: Objection, to prosecutor reading Exhibit One while standing behind my client.
Prosecutor: moving would only suggest that the defendant was ashamed of his words and guilty of treason, an action on my part that might prejudice the jury and deprive the defendant of due process.
Judge: Mr. Prosecutor, this court respects sincerity and holds cleverness in contempt. Proceed with caution.
Prosecutor: I will begin again.
North American Investment Fund Act (Introduced in Senate)
108th CONGRESS
2d Session
S. 2941
To authorize the President to negotiate the creation of a North American Investment Fund to promote economic and infrastructure integration among Canada, Mexico, and the United States, and for other purposes.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
October 7, 2004
Mr. BORNYN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations
A BILL
To authorize the President to negotiate the creation of a North American Investment Fund to promote economic and infrastructure integration among Canada, Mexico, and the United States, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `North American Investment Fund Act'.
SEC. 2. AUTHORITY FOR A NORTH AMERICAN INVESTMENT FUND.
The President is authorized to negotiate with the Governments of Canada and Mexico to create a North American Investment Fund, as described in this Act (hereinafter referred to as the `Fund'), by--
SEC. 3. PURPOSES.
The purposes of the Fund shall be--
(1) to promote economic and infrastructure integration among Canada, Mexico, and the United States;
(2) to promote education and economic development in Mexico; and
(3) to reduce the wealth gap between Mexico and Canada, and between Mexico and the United States.
SEC. 4. PROJECTS FUNDED.
(a) IN GENERAL- The Fund shall make grants for projects to carry out the purposes described in section 3, including projects--
(1) to construct roads in Mexico to facilitate trade
SEC. 5. CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE FUND.
(a) IN GENERAL- The terms of the agreement establishing the Fund shall, subject to the limitation in subsection (b), require the Governments of Canada, Mexico, and the United States to contribute to the Fund.
Prosecutor: Article III Section3 of the Unites States Constitution declares: Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted or treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act or on confession in open court.
Prosecutor continues: The defendant’s twice reading of the proposed law in public complies with the stipulation of “testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act”.
Before the defense attorney objects, I could subpoena every person on this planet who has seen or heard a tape of the defendant’s words.
Defense Attorney: No objection, defense agrees to the stipulation.
Prosecutor: I would now like to introduce and read excerpts from a public document containing testimony supporting the defendant’s treasonous efforts the defense has stipulated fulfills Constitutional standards for treason.
Judge Interrupts: The stipulation was to allow the twice readings to be witnesses not specific charges.
Prosecutor: You are correct Judge. The defendant’s words are witnesses to the specific act of attempting to replace the United States of America with a new political system known as “North American Community”.
(Prosecutor starts to read.): Prosecutor’s Exhibit Number Two: A public document.
American Community Approach to Security
June 9, 2005
(Edited) Testimony before a hearing of the Subcommittee on the Western
Hemisphere U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee. By vice President
and director of the Center for North American Studies.
As we approach the fourth anniversary of 9/11, it is time for us to step back from our trauma and the border and examine the problem in a broader context. The best way to assure security is not at our borders with Canada and Mexico and not by defining “security” in conventional and narrow terms. We need to think about these issues in the context of a continent that is integrating economically and socially at a rapid rate
What we need to do now is forge a North American Community, based on the premise that each member benefits from its neighbor’s success and is diminished by its problems.
In my statement, I will comment first on the emergence of North America, the next decade’s agenda, and the response by the three governments. Next, I will describe some of the recommendations of the Council Task Force Report and focus on the travel initiative and the security and border issues.
The U.S. Congress should also merge the U.S.-Mexican and U.S.-Canadian inter-parliamentary groups into a single “North American Parliamentary Group.” A third institution should be a “Permanent Tribunal on Trade and Investment.” A permanent court would permit the accumulation of precedent and lay the groundwork for North American business law.
North American governments can learn from the EU’s efforts to establish EU Educational and Research Centers in the United States. Centers for North American Studies in the United States, Canada, and Mexico would help people in all three countries to understand the problems and the potential of an integrated North America— and to think of themselves as North Americans. Scholarships should encourage North American students to study in each other’s country. Until a new consciousness of North America’s promise takes root, many of these proposals will remain impractical.
Perimeter: Instead of creating new obstacles at the border, we should find ways to ease traffic and harmonize safety and transportation obtain a Border Pass, which would be accepted at all border points within North America as a complement to passports.
The U.S., Mexican, and Canadian governments remain zealous defenders of an outdated conception of sovereignty even though their citizens are ready for a new approach. Each nation’s leadership has stressed differences rather than common interests. North America needs leaders who can articulate and pursue a broader vision.
I hope this Committee will pursue the North American agenda beyond the travel initiative considered here. These should be reviewed together with Senator Richard Lugar’s far-sighted bill for a “North American Cooperative Security Act” and Senator Bornyn’s “North American Investment Fund.” The time has come for us to define a true North American Community. (end of document)
Prosecutor: Prosecution for the Constitution’s first witness is Heavenly Angel Number Five.
Prosecutor to Heavenly Angel Number Five: Is there any entity or person who can confirm your identity?
Heavenly Angel Number Five: The Judge.
Judge: This is Heavenly Angel Number Five.
Prosecutor to Heavenly Angel Number Five: Did the defendant take an oath to God and or make a spiritual contract with God to “uphold, protect, and defend” the United States Constitution?
Heavenly Angel Number Five: Yes.
Prosecutor: Is the spirit of the defendant’s oath and or contract consistent with the United States Constitution and Prosecution for Constitution Exhibit Number One?
Heavenly Angel Number Five: No.
Prosecutor: Is the defendant in violation of his oath with God and or has the defendant broken his contract with God.
Heavenly Angel Number Five: Yes
Prosecutor: Based on your spiritual experiences, are individuals who violate oaths or break contracts with God more likely or less likely to engage in treason against their country, their republic, and their republic’s constitution?
Heavenly Angel Number Five: More Likely
Prosecutor: No more questions.
Defense Attorney: No questions. (Whispers to defendant.) Only a fool would challenge the integrity of one of Heaven’s Angels. I’m here to try and save your soul, not lose my mine.
Prosecutor: Prosecution for the U.S. Constitution calls George Washington as the next witness.
Prosecutor: Are you the George Washington who had occasion to be Commander and Chief of America’s Revolutionary forces who won America’s Independence from England, and are you the same George Washington who had occasion to serve as America’s first President?
George Washington: Yes to both questions.
Prosecutor: Mr. President, did you make the following statements in your Farwell Address. The basis of our political system is the right of the people to make and to alter their constitutions of government. But the Constitution which at any time exists, till changed by an explicit and authentic act of the whole people, is sacredly obligatory upon all.
Did you also state in your Farwell Address: It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world. There can be no greater error than to calculate upon real favors from nation to nation. It is an illusion, which experience must cure, which a just pride ought to discard.
George Washington: Yes to both.
Prosecutor to George Washington: Based on your knowledge of original intent of the United Sates Constitution, and your many earthly experiences with international tyrants; would you testify under oath before God himself that Prosecution for Constitution Exhibits One and Two represents words, actions, and associations of a patriot or traitor.
George Washington: Traitor. Traitor.
Defense Attorney: No questions. (Whispers to defendant.) Only a fool would challenge the integrity of George Washington. I’m here to try and save your life, not lose my mine.
Prosecutor: Prosecution for the Constitution calls President Abraham Lincoln to the stand.
Prosecutor: President Lincoln, did you have occasion to serve the United States of America during the 1860’s?
President Lincoln: Yes.
Prosecutor: How many Americans died in your service during your administration trying to uphold, protect and defend America’s Constitution?
President Lincoln: Including civilian casualties, one million plus one.
Prosecutor: That’s right you also died in service of your sacred oath to uphold, protect, and defend the Constitution and Bill of Rights. How does it make you feel when you see elected officials who took the same oath as you died for, creating and supporting documents like Prosecution for the Constitution Exhibits One and Two?
President Lincoln: Breaks my heart to think that all the suffering and sacrifices during our nation’s Civil War, a war between brothers and neighbors was in vain.
Prosecutor: Mr. Lincoln would you consider the defendant’s words and actions to be helpful or harmful to the Constitution you served through death?
President Lincoln: Beyond harmful.
Defense Attorney: Judge, how many more past away witnesses does the Prosecutor intend to call?
Prosecutor: I am prepared to call every past away soul who died defending America’s Constitution. Probably over four million, as for the exact total, your Honor would know that better than me.
Continuing: As for the lying, probably over fifty million who have suffered because of the defendant’s treasonous policies; again, your Honor would better know the exact number better than me.
Judge To Prosecutor: I warned you about being clever.
Prosecutor: With all due respect your honor, my commitment to total due process for the Constitution is about sincerity not being clever.
Judge: Perhaps the Prosecutor and Defense Attorney can reach an agreement that does not involve calling millions and millions of both living and past away witnesses.
Prosecutor Looking At Defendant Then Defense Attorney: Here is your one and only two choice deal.
One, defendant publicly hangs for treason; eternal damnation for defendant’s soul; and perpetual condemnation for defendant’s reputation; or
Two, defendant will be asked for any last words of contrition before he is publicly hanged for treason; the defendant can save his soul from eternal damnation and his reputation from perpetual condemnation by giving Americans names they can curse, despise, and hate more than his.
Prosecutor Looks at Defendant: Your choice traitor.
Defendant Starts To Speak:
Continue Plus 101
Truth Melts Wax Images
This writing exercise was originally entitled Texas Trans Terrorist Corridor. The update resulted from a friend asking me how one can spot less than dishonest public officials. The eventual answer was let heat of truth melt wax away from political cannibals.
Case study for this writing exercise is Texas Governor Rick Perry a politician last elected in a equally strong three candidate election.
One of Perry’s first shameful solutions was supporting Mexico’s theft of millions of acre feet of water from South Texas agricultural border communities. Some feel the Governor in 2002 tolerated economic terrorism against America’s ranching and farming community by not supporting policies forcing Mexico to return water stolen from United States.
Perry’s disloyalty to South Texas citizens cost Americans estimated two billion dollars and thirty thousand jobs. These cold statistics do not include unknown number of farmers and ranchers losing their farms, ranches, and homes.
There always comes a time in life when choice is, stand for what is right, like opposing construction of Texas Trans Terrorist Corridor impervious of consequences or walk away.
On side supporting construction of Texas Trans Terrorist Corridor: President Bush II, Senator Hutchison, Senator Cornyn, Texas Governor Perry along with Texas’s Lt. Governor, other Texas officials include Speaker of the House, Attorney General, General Land Office, Republican moneylenders, American International Corporate Socialists (AICS), pro NAFTA Groups, and especially Texas Department of Transportation.
On the other side, one part time senile farmer’s son, your author conservative John R. Marshall licensed surveillance instructor and other unnamed patriots. In spirit of Col. Travis who asked his volunteers to step on the line not cross the line, this is not about courage, more like somewhere between living by principle not for principal.
United States Government is about to allow building world’s largest ground transportation system for Hezbollah’s immerging staging area in Latin America. Route proceeds from Brazil to Monterrey, Mexico through Laredo, Texas to Kansas City to Canada. Having an understanding of Monterrey’s political history will explain why Hezbollah has chosen Monterrey as a logistical area to launch attacks into America.
Why no major terrorist attacks in America since 9-11? While United Stats has been tied down in Iraq and not securing its southern borders or policing domestic premises; foreign terrorists have been quietly preparing for their next attack by establishing sleeper cells on American soil with logistical support supplied by way of Mexico though porous southern border.
Hezbollah has managed to put America’s foreign policy in a catch twenty-two scenario; come down hard on Iran for developing nuclear weapons and threaten U.S. economy with anarchy by releasing sleeper cell attacks on American soil.
Catch twenty-two part, no politician wants to threaten their legacy with actions that could easily result in tens of thousands of citizen casualties on American soil. Less than courageous decisions enables next administrations deal with the inevitable.
Bad News: New World Order signifies AICS renewed greedy efforts for old world order attempted by Americans investing in Germany’s Nationalist Socialist Party during WWII. Fact atrocities of French Revolution will fade in comparison to America’s Second Civil War ignited by Trans Texas Corridor better known as Trans Terrorist Corridor.
America’s next civil war fighters will be independent nationalists against alliance of AICS moneylenders and Democratic Party world owes me public subsidy addicts. Doubt my words, watch amnesty bi-partisan deal, and economic bi-partisan bail out packages assisting anti-conservative aristocrats and public subsidy addicts.
If Texas Trans Terrorist Corridor supporters did not know their objectives were not in America’s best interest, why have they created special jurisdiction courts to enforce special exemption legislation for Texas Trans Terrorist Corridor to steal private property for international corporate interests?
Path for the Trans Terrorist Corridor includes an estimated two thousand mile twelve hundred foot wide transportation system, which will for foreign corporate interests displace more than a million American citizens and confiscate through imminent domain abuses an estimated million and half acres of prime farm and ranch land.
The spark that starts America’s Second Civil war occurs when property owners, many who owned their land for over a hundred years, object to state troopers evicting senior citizens from homes, farms, and ranches based on orders by Texas Trans Terrorist Corridor special courts.
One of these emotionally distraught property owners will reach for a weapon and be shot dead by overzealous law enforcement. Neighbors not being sympathetic to friends being gunned down by government agents while stealing property for Republican moneylenders, liberal Democrats, and foreign corporate interests will choose sides.
Governor Perry’s belief that his Texas government can do what it wants, and Texans can take it and like it attitude will call on feds to finish his evil deeds. Crisis escalates and more Americans choose sides; Middle East terrorists along with radical Hispanics seeking re-conquest of their Mexican homelands will exploit the tensions between Texas landowners and out of control law enforcement.
America’s next uncivil war will not be like America’s first uncivil war where people in blue uniforms lined up in straight lines and shot across open fields at people lined up in gray uniforms.
The weapon of choice in America’s next uncivil war will be deer rifles and hit and run strategies. Politicians need to be reminded that people who can be photographed can be shot by snipers.
A little country logic, since no one has gotten killed yet, it is not too late to delay the inevitable. Consider the following:
1) International corporate interests take their corridor scam to Vermont, those people elect socialists.
2) Texas political prostitutes take their ill-gotten gains better know as bribes and leave Texas.
3) Texas Department of Transportation is reorganized and employees that supported Trans Terrorist Corridor leave Texas.
4) Texas rural property owners go back to farming or ranching and complaining about the weather.
5) I return to looking for work as a ranch scout.
Imagine a future America where Texas politicians and Republican moneylenders are not standing on America’s southern border waving to Middle East and Hispanic terrorists we have made our money, you all come on in.
One not yet discussed consequence of Texas Trans Terrorist Corridor, how are Americans not living in Texas going to react to Texans responsible for allowing building of infra-structure that moves terrorists into non Texas communities?
This writing exercise was originally entitled Texas Trans Terrorist Corridor. The update resulted from a friend asking me how one can spot less than dishonest public officials. The eventual answer was let heat of truth melt wax away from political cannibals.
Case study for this writing exercise is Texas Governor Rick Perry a politician last elected in a equally strong three candidate election.
One of Perry’s first shameful solutions was supporting Mexico’s theft of millions of acre feet of water from South Texas agricultural border communities. Some feel the Governor in 2002 tolerated economic terrorism against America’s ranching and farming community by not supporting policies forcing Mexico to return water stolen from United States.
Perry’s disloyalty to South Texas citizens cost Americans estimated two billion dollars and thirty thousand jobs. These cold statistics do not include unknown number of farmers and ranchers losing their farms, ranches, and homes.
There always comes a time in life when choice is, stand for what is right, like opposing construction of Texas Trans Terrorist Corridor impervious of consequences or walk away.
On side supporting construction of Texas Trans Terrorist Corridor: President Bush II, Senator Hutchison, Senator Cornyn, Texas Governor Perry along with Texas’s Lt. Governor, other Texas officials include Speaker of the House, Attorney General, General Land Office, Republican moneylenders, American International Corporate Socialists (AICS), pro NAFTA Groups, and especially Texas Department of Transportation.
On the other side, one part time senile farmer’s son, your author conservative John R. Marshall licensed surveillance instructor and other unnamed patriots. In spirit of Col. Travis who asked his volunteers to step on the line not cross the line, this is not about courage, more like somewhere between living by principle not for principal.
United States Government is about to allow building world’s largest ground transportation system for Hezbollah’s immerging staging area in Latin America. Route proceeds from Brazil to Monterrey, Mexico through Laredo, Texas to Kansas City to Canada. Having an understanding of Monterrey’s political history will explain why Hezbollah has chosen Monterrey as a logistical area to launch attacks into America.
Why no major terrorist attacks in America since 9-11? While United Stats has been tied down in Iraq and not securing its southern borders or policing domestic premises; foreign terrorists have been quietly preparing for their next attack by establishing sleeper cells on American soil with logistical support supplied by way of Mexico though porous southern border.
Hezbollah has managed to put America’s foreign policy in a catch twenty-two scenario; come down hard on Iran for developing nuclear weapons and threaten U.S. economy with anarchy by releasing sleeper cell attacks on American soil.
Catch twenty-two part, no politician wants to threaten their legacy with actions that could easily result in tens of thousands of citizen casualties on American soil. Less than courageous decisions enables next administrations deal with the inevitable.
Bad News: New World Order signifies AICS renewed greedy efforts for old world order attempted by Americans investing in Germany’s Nationalist Socialist Party during WWII. Fact atrocities of French Revolution will fade in comparison to America’s Second Civil War ignited by Trans Texas Corridor better known as Trans Terrorist Corridor.
America’s next civil war fighters will be independent nationalists against alliance of AICS moneylenders and Democratic Party world owes me public subsidy addicts. Doubt my words, watch amnesty bi-partisan deal, and economic bi-partisan bail out packages assisting anti-conservative aristocrats and public subsidy addicts.
If Texas Trans Terrorist Corridor supporters did not know their objectives were not in America’s best interest, why have they created special jurisdiction courts to enforce special exemption legislation for Texas Trans Terrorist Corridor to steal private property for international corporate interests?
Path for the Trans Terrorist Corridor includes an estimated two thousand mile twelve hundred foot wide transportation system, which will for foreign corporate interests displace more than a million American citizens and confiscate through imminent domain abuses an estimated million and half acres of prime farm and ranch land.
The spark that starts America’s Second Civil war occurs when property owners, many who owned their land for over a hundred years, object to state troopers evicting senior citizens from homes, farms, and ranches based on orders by Texas Trans Terrorist Corridor special courts.
One of these emotionally distraught property owners will reach for a weapon and be shot dead by overzealous law enforcement. Neighbors not being sympathetic to friends being gunned down by government agents while stealing property for Republican moneylenders, liberal Democrats, and foreign corporate interests will choose sides.
Governor Perry’s belief that his Texas government can do what it wants, and Texans can take it and like it attitude will call on feds to finish his evil deeds. Crisis escalates and more Americans choose sides; Middle East terrorists along with radical Hispanics seeking re-conquest of their Mexican homelands will exploit the tensions between Texas landowners and out of control law enforcement.
America’s next uncivil war will not be like America’s first uncivil war where people in blue uniforms lined up in straight lines and shot across open fields at people lined up in gray uniforms.
The weapon of choice in America’s next uncivil war will be deer rifles and hit and run strategies. Politicians need to be reminded that people who can be photographed can be shot by snipers.
A little country logic, since no one has gotten killed yet, it is not too late to delay the inevitable. Consider the following:
1) International corporate interests take their corridor scam to Vermont, those people elect socialists.
2) Texas political prostitutes take their ill-gotten gains better know as bribes and leave Texas.
3) Texas Department of Transportation is reorganized and employees that supported Trans Terrorist Corridor leave Texas.
4) Texas rural property owners go back to farming or ranching and complaining about the weather.
5) I return to looking for work as a ranch scout.
Imagine a future America where Texas politicians and Republican moneylenders are not standing on America’s southern border waving to Middle East and Hispanic terrorists we have made our money, you all come on in.
One not yet discussed consequence of Texas Trans Terrorist Corridor, how are Americans not living in Texas going to react to Texans responsible for allowing building of infra-structure that moves terrorists into non Texas communities?
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
Continue Plus 100
(Three Texas Officers) + Two =
Conservatives biggest weakness is their greatest strength. Before you the reader presupposes the part time dementia part of this old farmer’s son turned Texas drifter is showing. Withhold your opinion until you realize that conservative patriot’s greatest strength is free will.
Benjamin Franklin chose America’s future over his son and his son’s support for England during America’s War for Independence. Loyalty to common principles sometimes requires comradeship with those who have different free will interpretations of common principles.
Three most recognized military officers during Texas War for Independence were and still are General Houston, Colonel Travis, and Colonel Bowie. What most people do not know is that these three military officers did like each other.
Houston and Travis both publicly stated that they never did like each other. Bowie reportedly told Houston that his strategy to win war was dumbest blanking thing he had ever heard.
Travis and Bowie made a gentleman’s agreement to settle their differences in a duel to death when war was over. Something to ask yourself, why would two men who were willing to kill each other during peace time be willing to die fighting side by side behind crumbling walls of an old church?
Primary distinction between most liberal Democrats and most conservative Republicans is as simple as understanding distinctions between supporting evil out of greed, vanity, or hate; and tolerating misinterpretations of shared principles by free will decisions.
This writing exercise compares people who live by principle and those who live for principal. Houston, Travis, and Bowie all understood that sharing common principles based on free will decisions with people does not mean you have to like or socialize with them.
Contemporary example, I do not partially like Bush II strategies on fighting terrorism, immigration reform, expanding government socialism in name of compassionate welfare, or trade policies which are destroying America’s domestic manufacturing base.
Care less for Bush II collaborating with socialist democrats to nationalize America’s housing, financial, manufacturing industries, and any other unethical business that considers bribing government cost of doing business.
It seems most Republican elected have misrepresented every principle conservatives share in common. Conservatives primary principle, goal, strategy, and tactic defending America’s Constitution from all enemies domestic and foreign,
Time to compare Marxist Democrats and internationalist compromising Republicans to accomplishments of conservative Republicans and Reagan Democrats; populists are not included in comparisons simply because mob rule results in anarchy like that of French Revolution.
Starting with destructive Marxist Socialist Democrats’ policies: more public sector discrimination; more societal prejudice; more promiscuity; more broken families; more bigger and incompetent government bureaucracies; permanent welfare class; destruction of private sector middle class; weaker military; pampering terrorists; more illegal immigration; lower public health standards; more public health pandemics; more crime; reduction of constitutional standards and inalienable rights reaffirmed in Bill of Rights; and less healthy environments from environmental fascism called Greenism. List could be added too, but I will leave that up to you.
Moving on to failed policies of internationalist compromisers better know as moderate Republicans. Results are minimally different than Carter’s Chamberlain type administration.
One incompetent war against terrorism strategy (not post event conclusions rather observations made before Bush II invaded Iraq) the primary valid objective was to buy time to improve Homeland security defenses.
Best strategy would have been to put majority of resources in Afghanistan to permanently crush and eradicate Taliban, then lease isolated easily defendable terrain for fifty years to establish base to harass and destroy neighborhood trouble makes like Iraq, Iran, Syria, or help some not all allies like Israel, Egypt, Turkey, Pakistan, India all while improving America’s homeland defenses.
Proper strategy while and after setting up base in Afghanistan should have been while proceeding with primary objective building America’s Homeland defenses starting with perimeter security, gather intelligence on terrorists world wide; counter intelligence covert operations to weaken terrorist organizations and get terrorists to start killing each other; track down and kill terrorists at every presented opportunity; and continue killing remaining terrorists as future examples for terrorist collaborators.
Bush’s advisers apparently convinced him to use enough troops in Iraq and Afghanistan to win war but not manage peace; while at same time ignoring building up Homeland’s defenses. Ever heard of porous borders and amnesty which encourages illegal immigrants to flood into America while providing cover for terrorists to enter America?
Continued Republican and Democrats actions of not securing America’s Southern border while inciting illegal immigrants to primarily leave Mexico, will only delay eventual violent revolution in Mexico and guaranteed terrorist attacks on American soil. Obvious future fact kept secret by some public advisers, why else were terrorist attacks on American soil redefined based on number of casualties? Terrorist attacks killing small numbers of Americans have been reclassified as hate crimes.
Counterfeit conservatives are putting America’s security last by supporting internationalist trade treaties which destroy America’s domestic manufacturing base; destroy America’s private sector middle class using illegal immigrants, and destroys America’s ruling government by establishing a Northern hemisphere unelected government among Mexico, Canada, and United States. Could go about counterfeit conservative national security threats, but point has been made.
Anti conservative aristocrats and moderate Republicans are using internationalist greed based strategies: and government controlled economic policies to addict America’s economy to consumer debt. Bad times are coming, example Federal Reserve adopting government policies mirroring Germany’s nationalist socialism used to rebuild Germany’s economy following World War I which eventually creates World War II imperialism.
The difference between Marxism and fascism, in Marxist economies, all property and means of production are owned by government. In fascist economies, property and means of production are owned by private sector, but so related by government that eventually there is little difference between Marxism and fascism.
Now the good part, conservative accomplishments based on equal opportunity without privilege based on life, liberty, and free will: created Declaration of Independence; won America’s Revolutionary War; created and adopted Constitution and Bill of Rights; Monroe Doctrine; supported Texas War for Independence; Manifest Destiny; fought Civil War end private sector slavery not establish public sector slavery; settled West; revolutionized industrialization that introduced America to world as superpower; T. Roosevelt’s conservation policies; T. Roosevelt’s anti monopoly policies; won World War I; survived Great Depression; won World War II; won Cold War; expanded capitalism world wide; built world’s wealthiest nation; led and still lead world’s scientific and technology revolution; world’s leading hope destroy terrorism; my point made, I am sure readers can add many more of their own examples.
Conservative patriots need recognize threats and how to defend themselves. Points that cannot be over looked, reminding conservatives they have a right to defend themselves, their families, country, and Constitution from bad guys; and second remind conservatives what they stand to lose if bad guys win.
Finally, free will can cause different individuals to interpret same principles differently. Three Texas military officers plus two Founding Fathers, Jefferson and Adams, taught us that prudence requires defeating common enemies before settling personal dislikes or differences.
Conservatives biggest weakness is their greatest strength. Before you the reader presupposes the part time dementia part of this old farmer’s son turned Texas drifter is showing. Withhold your opinion until you realize that conservative patriot’s greatest strength is free will.
Benjamin Franklin chose America’s future over his son and his son’s support for England during America’s War for Independence. Loyalty to common principles sometimes requires comradeship with those who have different free will interpretations of common principles.
Three most recognized military officers during Texas War for Independence were and still are General Houston, Colonel Travis, and Colonel Bowie. What most people do not know is that these three military officers did like each other.
Houston and Travis both publicly stated that they never did like each other. Bowie reportedly told Houston that his strategy to win war was dumbest blanking thing he had ever heard.
Travis and Bowie made a gentleman’s agreement to settle their differences in a duel to death when war was over. Something to ask yourself, why would two men who were willing to kill each other during peace time be willing to die fighting side by side behind crumbling walls of an old church?
Primary distinction between most liberal Democrats and most conservative Republicans is as simple as understanding distinctions between supporting evil out of greed, vanity, or hate; and tolerating misinterpretations of shared principles by free will decisions.
This writing exercise compares people who live by principle and those who live for principal. Houston, Travis, and Bowie all understood that sharing common principles based on free will decisions with people does not mean you have to like or socialize with them.
Contemporary example, I do not partially like Bush II strategies on fighting terrorism, immigration reform, expanding government socialism in name of compassionate welfare, or trade policies which are destroying America’s domestic manufacturing base.
Care less for Bush II collaborating with socialist democrats to nationalize America’s housing, financial, manufacturing industries, and any other unethical business that considers bribing government cost of doing business.
It seems most Republican elected have misrepresented every principle conservatives share in common. Conservatives primary principle, goal, strategy, and tactic defending America’s Constitution from all enemies domestic and foreign,
Time to compare Marxist Democrats and internationalist compromising Republicans to accomplishments of conservative Republicans and Reagan Democrats; populists are not included in comparisons simply because mob rule results in anarchy like that of French Revolution.
Starting with destructive Marxist Socialist Democrats’ policies: more public sector discrimination; more societal prejudice; more promiscuity; more broken families; more bigger and incompetent government bureaucracies; permanent welfare class; destruction of private sector middle class; weaker military; pampering terrorists; more illegal immigration; lower public health standards; more public health pandemics; more crime; reduction of constitutional standards and inalienable rights reaffirmed in Bill of Rights; and less healthy environments from environmental fascism called Greenism. List could be added too, but I will leave that up to you.
Moving on to failed policies of internationalist compromisers better know as moderate Republicans. Results are minimally different than Carter’s Chamberlain type administration.
One incompetent war against terrorism strategy (not post event conclusions rather observations made before Bush II invaded Iraq) the primary valid objective was to buy time to improve Homeland security defenses.
Best strategy would have been to put majority of resources in Afghanistan to permanently crush and eradicate Taliban, then lease isolated easily defendable terrain for fifty years to establish base to harass and destroy neighborhood trouble makes like Iraq, Iran, Syria, or help some not all allies like Israel, Egypt, Turkey, Pakistan, India all while improving America’s homeland defenses.
Proper strategy while and after setting up base in Afghanistan should have been while proceeding with primary objective building America’s Homeland defenses starting with perimeter security, gather intelligence on terrorists world wide; counter intelligence covert operations to weaken terrorist organizations and get terrorists to start killing each other; track down and kill terrorists at every presented opportunity; and continue killing remaining terrorists as future examples for terrorist collaborators.
Bush’s advisers apparently convinced him to use enough troops in Iraq and Afghanistan to win war but not manage peace; while at same time ignoring building up Homeland’s defenses. Ever heard of porous borders and amnesty which encourages illegal immigrants to flood into America while providing cover for terrorists to enter America?
Continued Republican and Democrats actions of not securing America’s Southern border while inciting illegal immigrants to primarily leave Mexico, will only delay eventual violent revolution in Mexico and guaranteed terrorist attacks on American soil. Obvious future fact kept secret by some public advisers, why else were terrorist attacks on American soil redefined based on number of casualties? Terrorist attacks killing small numbers of Americans have been reclassified as hate crimes.
Counterfeit conservatives are putting America’s security last by supporting internationalist trade treaties which destroy America’s domestic manufacturing base; destroy America’s private sector middle class using illegal immigrants, and destroys America’s ruling government by establishing a Northern hemisphere unelected government among Mexico, Canada, and United States. Could go about counterfeit conservative national security threats, but point has been made.
Anti conservative aristocrats and moderate Republicans are using internationalist greed based strategies: and government controlled economic policies to addict America’s economy to consumer debt. Bad times are coming, example Federal Reserve adopting government policies mirroring Germany’s nationalist socialism used to rebuild Germany’s economy following World War I which eventually creates World War II imperialism.
The difference between Marxism and fascism, in Marxist economies, all property and means of production are owned by government. In fascist economies, property and means of production are owned by private sector, but so related by government that eventually there is little difference between Marxism and fascism.
Now the good part, conservative accomplishments based on equal opportunity without privilege based on life, liberty, and free will: created Declaration of Independence; won America’s Revolutionary War; created and adopted Constitution and Bill of Rights; Monroe Doctrine; supported Texas War for Independence; Manifest Destiny; fought Civil War end private sector slavery not establish public sector slavery; settled West; revolutionized industrialization that introduced America to world as superpower; T. Roosevelt’s conservation policies; T. Roosevelt’s anti monopoly policies; won World War I; survived Great Depression; won World War II; won Cold War; expanded capitalism world wide; built world’s wealthiest nation; led and still lead world’s scientific and technology revolution; world’s leading hope destroy terrorism; my point made, I am sure readers can add many more of their own examples.
Conservative patriots need recognize threats and how to defend themselves. Points that cannot be over looked, reminding conservatives they have a right to defend themselves, their families, country, and Constitution from bad guys; and second remind conservatives what they stand to lose if bad guys win.
Finally, free will can cause different individuals to interpret same principles differently. Three Texas military officers plus two Founding Fathers, Jefferson and Adams, taught us that prudence requires defeating common enemies before settling personal dislikes or differences.
Tuesday, December 9, 2008
Continue Plus 99
You Vote On Bush II Legacy
Question, can truthful claim be made Bush II, based on campaign promises intentionally exploited Christian faith and violated public oaths to Heaven to uphold protect and defend Constitution and Bill of Rights for personal and political gain?
Standards for selecting one word to define Bush II legacy, compare Bush II campaign promises and public oaths to private and public actions.
List promises to combined and or mixed Christian, conservative, patriot voting base you the reader can develop own list.
President Bush II personal conduct and public actions compared to campaign promises, you the reader can provide own examples.
Possible Future History Conclusions:
Charlatan
Impostor
Fake
Fraud
Swindler
Counterfeit
Pretender
Con artist
Liar
Hypocrite
Demagogue
Malevolent
You, the Christian, conservative, patriot reader can use your free will to choose above choice. Note: votes from non-American citizens, socialist American citizens, and non patriotic or America last crowd citizens not counted.
As this is a Texas drifter’s election, my choice is; can not answer as secret balloting is one of America’s remaining freedoms. Hint above choices are all too polite.
Question, can truthful claim be made Bush II, based on campaign promises intentionally exploited Christian faith and violated public oaths to Heaven to uphold protect and defend Constitution and Bill of Rights for personal and political gain?
Standards for selecting one word to define Bush II legacy, compare Bush II campaign promises and public oaths to private and public actions.
List promises to combined and or mixed Christian, conservative, patriot voting base you the reader can develop own list.
President Bush II personal conduct and public actions compared to campaign promises, you the reader can provide own examples.
Possible Future History Conclusions:
Charlatan
Impostor
Fake
Fraud
Swindler
Counterfeit
Pretender
Con artist
Liar
Hypocrite
Demagogue
Malevolent
You, the Christian, conservative, patriot reader can use your free will to choose above choice. Note: votes from non-American citizens, socialist American citizens, and non patriotic or America last crowd citizens not counted.
As this is a Texas drifter’s election, my choice is; can not answer as secret balloting is one of America’s remaining freedoms. Hint above choices are all too polite.
Monday, December 8, 2008
Continue Plus 98
Conservatives Guide To Freedom Fighters
Most ignored fact by American citizens is that words have different meaning to different people. Not all conservatives are conservatives; reference “Guide To American Political Cannibalism”.
There are two types of freedom fighters, those fighting for freedom and those fighting for tyranny. Examples of those fighting for tyranny includes Marxists, imperialists like Japan during World War II, and ideological butchers like Islamic fascists.
American history is best and only definitive history of freedom fighters. Who but a member of American last crowd cold suggest that following events were managed by Freedom fighters?
Could have added more but, following should suffice for this writing exercise: America’s War for Independence, War with Barbary Pirates, War with Britain 1812, Texas War for Independence, and War against Mexico’s imperialism 1845.
Even both sides in America’s Civil War were fought by freedom fighters, despite historical propaganda; Blacks were about only group fighting against slavery. Central issue of Civil War was whether states could voluntarily secede from Union. Northern troops said no, while Southern rebels fought for ultimate states rights issue.
Some including this author would suggest that Indian wars were fought to fulfill a “manifest destiny”. War with Spain was to allow America freedom to become an international power.
Moving on through twentieth century: World War I, World War II, Cold War (including North Korea and Vietnam) were all fought to preserve freedom, Grenada, Iraq War I was fought to defend energy which did and still does fuel freedom’s marketplace.
America is currently involved in one declared and two undeclared wars for freedom: War declared against Islamic Fascism, Undeclared wars against Internationalist Economic Imperialism (issue one world labor force through illegal immigration), and Militaristic Imperialism by countries like China, Russia, Cuba, Venezuela, and other third world countries.
Moving on too players in America’s current three front war, starting with identifying two sides. There are good guys and bad guys, since this is my writing exercise, I have luxury of identifying my self and traditional conservative patriots as good guys and political cannibals as bad guys (reference again Guide to American political Cannibalism).
Other players on both sides include following six types:
1) scouts, spies and traitors (difference between spies and traitors – spies are professional intelligence agents serving their home team while traitors gather intelligence for betraying their home team)
2) allies, collaborators, and sympathizers (examples - collaborators can be moderate Republicans who reach out to socialist Democrats while sympathizers can be “conservative” talk show hosts who give socialist democrats “benefit of doubt”)
3) professionals/hired guns
4) black market merchants, and criminals
5) pilgrims uniformed “compassionate feel good do gooders” and civillians who just not want to get involved
6) analysis of military institutions will be left to those more qualified than your author whose background is specifically in intelligence gathering
For instance, a covert operation to gather intelligence, sabotage, kidnap, or other objective is concerned with some of following: scout, stalk, “catch off guard”, discreetly leave, and return to base.
There are three types of political tactics:
I) Nonviolent - voting for most or least qualified candidate, seeking office through election or appointment, lobbying, trades, demonstrations, strikes, civil disobedience, bribery, black mail, coup d'etat and other methods.
II) Violent - sabotage (selective or general); defensive execution (different than assassination); war (conventional, nuclear, biological, or chemical); coup d'etat; and other methods.
Note: terrorism is not included as a viable tactic since goal of viable tactics is potential accomplishment of intended results.
However, an "ambush" is use of violence against players or collaborators. Ambush which is better known as a surprise attack can be a viable hit and run tactic. Historically terrorism has never achieved success against professionals, and should never be considered a viable tactic.
Terrorism can be defined as threat of or use of non-defensive violence against civilians, bystanders, or the non-involved.
There are two types terrorism: private sector and public sector (domestic and foreign).Goal of public sector terrorism is manipulation of majority or minority portions of population. Public sector motives for terrorism include: 1) greed for taxpayer dollars for career advancements; 2) lust for power to control citizens by reducing or eliminating constitutional rights; or 3) revenge which makes examples of citizens wanting freedom or justice. Some examples of public sector terrorism include: Sherman's March through Georgia, Wounded Knee, Ruby Ridge, Waco Massacre, countless on site executions, and numerous malicious/corrupt prosecutions.
Citizens should never forget that odds are fifty-fifty that any domestic terrorism could have been carried out by public sector bureaucrats pretending to be dissidents. Two motives for civil servants to frame bad guys include: 1) additional justification to pass legislation which gives government more power at expense of constitutional liberties and 2) more power translates into better job benefits and more career advancement opportunities for public sector bureaucrats.
Private sector terrorist objectives include:
1) retaliation or revenge against government terrorism; and
2) self defense from government terrorism; or over reaction to government abuses.
Ultimate source of terrorism is general population who tolerates government abuses of power. It needs to be understood that private sector terrorism is a response to real or perceived injustices caused by public sector actions against private citizens. An example involves parents who did not see provocation by child one, and punish child two for retaliating.
III) Nonparticipation - different than apathy; this tactic was first formalized by the Radical Civil Union in Argentina during the latter part of nineteenth century.
Nonparticipation may be resorted to when peaceful tactics do not achieve partial success and conditions do not warrant the use of violence. This approach may also be used to provide citizen time to acquire appropriate or additional resources for alternate responses.
A key factor in nonparticipation or partial nonparticipation is mass education. Community should be aware that group which has chosen not to support "lesser of two evils" is still politically conscious. In some scenarios, voters are accomplices to tyranny or mob rule. Some include 2008 elections.
This tactic allows the system sufficient time to stagnate from oppression or mismanagement; while providing activist with more material for propaganda.
The Radical Civic Union failed to achieve their long term goals even though their nonparticipation tactic served its purpose. By failing to remain publicly politically active, Radical Civic Union was not in a position to capitalize on initial success.
Nonparticipation extends beyond not voting and does not include being politically dormant. This tactic includes not working for or volunteering to help offending political system. At the same time, citizen should maintain political skills by working only for private nonprofit type organizations.
An element as important as being able to identify players for successful freedom fighters, knowing real world rules for success.
All personnel, weapons and tools are only as efficient as system using them. Bio-mechanical applications of weapons are consistent regardless of target. Types of weapons include: non-lethal and lethal.
All creatures have unique survival skills: for example camouflage stealth, speed, strength, or high reproductive rates. Consciousness resulting form knowledge, experience, and training can eliminate many of negative influences on human decision making processes. Some distractions include: confusion, anger, fear, or disorientation caused by physical/mental exhaustion or panic.
Natural condition or predisposition for a species known as humanity is political competition for social power driven by instinctive, emotional, and life experiences. Temporary or constant stimuli (neutral, favorable, or unfavorable) influences man's emotional state: contentment/apathy; pleasure/happiness; pain/unhappiness; fear/panic; frustration/anger; or curiosity. These have often been described as “terrible twos”.
These emotional states often dominate type of behavior response:
1. autonomous;
2. reflex;
3. innate/instinct;
4. imprinted/conditioned/learned;
5. reasoned and
6. creative/dreams/extended vision.
Injury, age, chemical imbalances, inadequate conditioning or learning can produce fluid personalities which fluctuate between left and right brain dominated personalities. Personality fluidity can also produce dysfunctional behavior which is caused by inappropriate impulse gratification.
Behavior in a neutral environment is amoral, and whether or not response is adequate or inadequate (functional or dysfunctional) depends on effect on stimuli.
There will always be ruling elite who manages social system at convenience or inconvenience of majority. Brutal reality indicates that puppet masters always have, and probably always will manage political systems. Only exception being Heaven’s inspired through America’s Founding Fathers, America’s checks and balances constitutional republic with Bill of Rights.
Power is to social sciences what energy is to physical sciences. Social power is having means to achieve a particular social goal. Might, may or may not make "right," but always determines how conditions will be.
Sufficient social power with appropriate timing controls. This can be expressed in following manner:
SP = Q1 + Q2 over T
Social Power equals Force [Quantity (Q1) plus Quality(Q2)] over Timing.
Quantity equals numerical strength
Quality equals
1) physical force, and or
2) psychological force:
threat
tact
personality/reputation
obligation/debt
mutual agreements
laws/rules
tradition
ideology
knowledge
deceit
negotiation/compromise
Timing may be affected by uncontrollable variable chance.
Power as behavior is amoral in a neutral or Ten Commandments or bill of Rights free environment. Political animals generally do what they perceive to be in their best interest; security not ideology is often ultimate goal.
There are four phases in a political operation: developing plan or goal; choosing strategy; executing strategy tactics; and preparation for opponents' reaction.
Resources and using them (logistics) are necessary conditions. This is obtained by comparing sides and situations:
Blue Client: SP= Q1 + Q2 over T
Green Client: SP = Q1 + Q2 over T
Adjustment options include: advantage of reaction; disadvantage of reaction; advantage of no reaction; and disadvantage of no reaction.
Any evaluation should include following: define problem; cause of problem; impact of problem; solution to problem; and results of solution.
Field encounters will always be at least a little different. Options are evaluated by cost to benefit ratios. Care should be taken to avoid: "it worked then" solutions; "insignificant details" (neglected details become exploitable weaknesses); social myths; over extended or estimated capabilities; and or not utilizing all opportunities.
Exploited mistakes or poor timing causes defeats not strengths, patience is crucial for there may be no second chances in conflict. Chances are, if they're not looking for you, they won't find you. Another technique of good security is being long gone before bad guys arrive or show up.
Artificial consciousness processes (ACP), subject for another writing exercise, may eventually supplement or eventually replace mental discipline, idealism, mysticism, or emotionalism in determining appropriate goals, strategy, tactics, or responses in social power encounters.
Other topics for further review:
- trust, loyalty, training, discipline
- resources and importance of timely replacement of resources
- access to latest technology
- reliable intelligence
- importance of valid communications
- realistic strategy (General Sam Houston knew he had one battle army)
- mental disciple to live with tough decisions
- no time outs when options are winning and losing
- logic and mathematics prove existence of God
First obligation of scouts, intelligence agents, and scouts: their assignments of delivering most accurate information and leave decision making to superiors. Custer ignored his scouts and paid for his foolishness.
Recall words can have different meanings; conservatives in name only are no different than freedom fighters fighting for tyranny. President Washington warned about trusting political pretenders, a trait describing many Republican politicians, advocates, and socialites.
Conserving America’s values, traditions, and constitutional republic depends on conservative actions based on conservative principles; not parroted words motivated only for votes, principal, or social status. Could not First Amendment to peaceably assemble, also extend to not assembling with counterfeit conservative Republicans unworthy of trust? Could answer extend to those who collaborate and sympathize with counterfeit conservative Republicans?
Most ignored fact by American citizens is that words have different meaning to different people. Not all conservatives are conservatives; reference “Guide To American Political Cannibalism”.
There are two types of freedom fighters, those fighting for freedom and those fighting for tyranny. Examples of those fighting for tyranny includes Marxists, imperialists like Japan during World War II, and ideological butchers like Islamic fascists.
American history is best and only definitive history of freedom fighters. Who but a member of American last crowd cold suggest that following events were managed by Freedom fighters?
Could have added more but, following should suffice for this writing exercise: America’s War for Independence, War with Barbary Pirates, War with Britain 1812, Texas War for Independence, and War against Mexico’s imperialism 1845.
Even both sides in America’s Civil War were fought by freedom fighters, despite historical propaganda; Blacks were about only group fighting against slavery. Central issue of Civil War was whether states could voluntarily secede from Union. Northern troops said no, while Southern rebels fought for ultimate states rights issue.
Some including this author would suggest that Indian wars were fought to fulfill a “manifest destiny”. War with Spain was to allow America freedom to become an international power.
Moving on through twentieth century: World War I, World War II, Cold War (including North Korea and Vietnam) were all fought to preserve freedom, Grenada, Iraq War I was fought to defend energy which did and still does fuel freedom’s marketplace.
America is currently involved in one declared and two undeclared wars for freedom: War declared against Islamic Fascism, Undeclared wars against Internationalist Economic Imperialism (issue one world labor force through illegal immigration), and Militaristic Imperialism by countries like China, Russia, Cuba, Venezuela, and other third world countries.
Moving on too players in America’s current three front war, starting with identifying two sides. There are good guys and bad guys, since this is my writing exercise, I have luxury of identifying my self and traditional conservative patriots as good guys and political cannibals as bad guys (reference again Guide to American political Cannibalism).
Other players on both sides include following six types:
1) scouts, spies and traitors (difference between spies and traitors – spies are professional intelligence agents serving their home team while traitors gather intelligence for betraying their home team)
2) allies, collaborators, and sympathizers (examples - collaborators can be moderate Republicans who reach out to socialist Democrats while sympathizers can be “conservative” talk show hosts who give socialist democrats “benefit of doubt”)
3) professionals/hired guns
4) black market merchants, and criminals
5) pilgrims uniformed “compassionate feel good do gooders” and civillians who just not want to get involved
6) analysis of military institutions will be left to those more qualified than your author whose background is specifically in intelligence gathering
For instance, a covert operation to gather intelligence, sabotage, kidnap, or other objective is concerned with some of following: scout, stalk, “catch off guard”, discreetly leave, and return to base.
There are three types of political tactics:
I) Nonviolent - voting for most or least qualified candidate, seeking office through election or appointment, lobbying, trades, demonstrations, strikes, civil disobedience, bribery, black mail, coup d'etat and other methods.
II) Violent - sabotage (selective or general); defensive execution (different than assassination); war (conventional, nuclear, biological, or chemical); coup d'etat; and other methods.
Note: terrorism is not included as a viable tactic since goal of viable tactics is potential accomplishment of intended results.
However, an "ambush" is use of violence against players or collaborators. Ambush which is better known as a surprise attack can be a viable hit and run tactic. Historically terrorism has never achieved success against professionals, and should never be considered a viable tactic.
Terrorism can be defined as threat of or use of non-defensive violence against civilians, bystanders, or the non-involved.
There are two types terrorism: private sector and public sector (domestic and foreign).Goal of public sector terrorism is manipulation of majority or minority portions of population. Public sector motives for terrorism include: 1) greed for taxpayer dollars for career advancements; 2) lust for power to control citizens by reducing or eliminating constitutional rights; or 3) revenge which makes examples of citizens wanting freedom or justice. Some examples of public sector terrorism include: Sherman's March through Georgia, Wounded Knee, Ruby Ridge, Waco Massacre, countless on site executions, and numerous malicious/corrupt prosecutions.
Citizens should never forget that odds are fifty-fifty that any domestic terrorism could have been carried out by public sector bureaucrats pretending to be dissidents. Two motives for civil servants to frame bad guys include: 1) additional justification to pass legislation which gives government more power at expense of constitutional liberties and 2) more power translates into better job benefits and more career advancement opportunities for public sector bureaucrats.
Private sector terrorist objectives include:
1) retaliation or revenge against government terrorism; and
2) self defense from government terrorism; or over reaction to government abuses.
Ultimate source of terrorism is general population who tolerates government abuses of power. It needs to be understood that private sector terrorism is a response to real or perceived injustices caused by public sector actions against private citizens. An example involves parents who did not see provocation by child one, and punish child two for retaliating.
III) Nonparticipation - different than apathy; this tactic was first formalized by the Radical Civil Union in Argentina during the latter part of nineteenth century.
Nonparticipation may be resorted to when peaceful tactics do not achieve partial success and conditions do not warrant the use of violence. This approach may also be used to provide citizen time to acquire appropriate or additional resources for alternate responses.
A key factor in nonparticipation or partial nonparticipation is mass education. Community should be aware that group which has chosen not to support "lesser of two evils" is still politically conscious. In some scenarios, voters are accomplices to tyranny or mob rule. Some include 2008 elections.
This tactic allows the system sufficient time to stagnate from oppression or mismanagement; while providing activist with more material for propaganda.
The Radical Civic Union failed to achieve their long term goals even though their nonparticipation tactic served its purpose. By failing to remain publicly politically active, Radical Civic Union was not in a position to capitalize on initial success.
Nonparticipation extends beyond not voting and does not include being politically dormant. This tactic includes not working for or volunteering to help offending political system. At the same time, citizen should maintain political skills by working only for private nonprofit type organizations.
An element as important as being able to identify players for successful freedom fighters, knowing real world rules for success.
All personnel, weapons and tools are only as efficient as system using them. Bio-mechanical applications of weapons are consistent regardless of target. Types of weapons include: non-lethal and lethal.
All creatures have unique survival skills: for example camouflage stealth, speed, strength, or high reproductive rates. Consciousness resulting form knowledge, experience, and training can eliminate many of negative influences on human decision making processes. Some distractions include: confusion, anger, fear, or disorientation caused by physical/mental exhaustion or panic.
Natural condition or predisposition for a species known as humanity is political competition for social power driven by instinctive, emotional, and life experiences. Temporary or constant stimuli (neutral, favorable, or unfavorable) influences man's emotional state: contentment/apathy; pleasure/happiness; pain/unhappiness; fear/panic; frustration/anger; or curiosity. These have often been described as “terrible twos”.
These emotional states often dominate type of behavior response:
1. autonomous;
2. reflex;
3. innate/instinct;
4. imprinted/conditioned/learned;
5. reasoned and
6. creative/dreams/extended vision.
Injury, age, chemical imbalances, inadequate conditioning or learning can produce fluid personalities which fluctuate between left and right brain dominated personalities. Personality fluidity can also produce dysfunctional behavior which is caused by inappropriate impulse gratification.
Behavior in a neutral environment is amoral, and whether or not response is adequate or inadequate (functional or dysfunctional) depends on effect on stimuli.
There will always be ruling elite who manages social system at convenience or inconvenience of majority. Brutal reality indicates that puppet masters always have, and probably always will manage political systems. Only exception being Heaven’s inspired through America’s Founding Fathers, America’s checks and balances constitutional republic with Bill of Rights.
Power is to social sciences what energy is to physical sciences. Social power is having means to achieve a particular social goal. Might, may or may not make "right," but always determines how conditions will be.
Sufficient social power with appropriate timing controls. This can be expressed in following manner:
SP = Q1 + Q2 over T
Social Power equals Force [Quantity (Q1) plus Quality(Q2)] over Timing.
Quantity equals numerical strength
Quality equals
1) physical force, and or
2) psychological force:
threat
tact
personality/reputation
obligation/debt
mutual agreements
laws/rules
tradition
ideology
knowledge
deceit
negotiation/compromise
Timing may be affected by uncontrollable variable chance.
Power as behavior is amoral in a neutral or Ten Commandments or bill of Rights free environment. Political animals generally do what they perceive to be in their best interest; security not ideology is often ultimate goal.
There are four phases in a political operation: developing plan or goal; choosing strategy; executing strategy tactics; and preparation for opponents' reaction.
Resources and using them (logistics) are necessary conditions. This is obtained by comparing sides and situations:
Blue Client: SP= Q1 + Q2 over T
Green Client: SP = Q1 + Q2 over T
Adjustment options include: advantage of reaction; disadvantage of reaction; advantage of no reaction; and disadvantage of no reaction.
Any evaluation should include following: define problem; cause of problem; impact of problem; solution to problem; and results of solution.
Field encounters will always be at least a little different. Options are evaluated by cost to benefit ratios. Care should be taken to avoid: "it worked then" solutions; "insignificant details" (neglected details become exploitable weaknesses); social myths; over extended or estimated capabilities; and or not utilizing all opportunities.
Exploited mistakes or poor timing causes defeats not strengths, patience is crucial for there may be no second chances in conflict. Chances are, if they're not looking for you, they won't find you. Another technique of good security is being long gone before bad guys arrive or show up.
Artificial consciousness processes (ACP), subject for another writing exercise, may eventually supplement or eventually replace mental discipline, idealism, mysticism, or emotionalism in determining appropriate goals, strategy, tactics, or responses in social power encounters.
Other topics for further review:
- trust, loyalty, training, discipline
- resources and importance of timely replacement of resources
- access to latest technology
- reliable intelligence
- importance of valid communications
- realistic strategy (General Sam Houston knew he had one battle army)
- mental disciple to live with tough decisions
- no time outs when options are winning and losing
- logic and mathematics prove existence of God
First obligation of scouts, intelligence agents, and scouts: their assignments of delivering most accurate information and leave decision making to superiors. Custer ignored his scouts and paid for his foolishness.
Recall words can have different meanings; conservatives in name only are no different than freedom fighters fighting for tyranny. President Washington warned about trusting political pretenders, a trait describing many Republican politicians, advocates, and socialites.
Conserving America’s values, traditions, and constitutional republic depends on conservative actions based on conservative principles; not parroted words motivated only for votes, principal, or social status. Could not First Amendment to peaceably assemble, also extend to not assembling with counterfeit conservative Republicans unworthy of trust? Could answer extend to those who collaborate and sympathize with counterfeit conservative Republicans?
Friday, December 5, 2008
Continue Plus 97
Christmas Card For Am650 KGAB Listeners
Those familiar with my writing exercises are familiar with my occasional “all writ” out notes. Some advantages of evolving from farmer’s son to hired gun, to part time senile licensed “Spy As a Verb” instructor, and full time Texas drifter should be noted another time.
Following silent patriot words offer ideas for you to consider while remembering the Judgment day is personal as one judged by what they do, not by what family, friends, neighbors, or compatriots do.
The Ten Commandments are not a living document allowing for interpretations or convenient changes. Example the command is honor thy father and mother, it does not say honor thy father and mother as long as doing so does not interfere with one’s pop culture life style.
An associate asked why I describe re-arranging words as writing exercises. Answer is not that complicated, when one compares my silent words to standards set by America's Founding Fathers some writing is too little too late.
Three of almost unlimited though mostly forgotten examples of words by patriots that seem to make a nice Christmas for patriots, enjoy.
1) Patrick Henry: Should I keep back my opinions at this time through fear of giving offence, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country and of an act of disloyalty towards the majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.
It is natural for man to indulge in illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts. Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst and provide for it.
Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased with the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, I know not what course others will take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death.
2) George Bancroft: Darkness closed upon the country, but it was no night for sleep. With one impulse the colonies sprung to arms; with one spirit they pledged themselves to each other "to be ready for the extreme event." With one heart the continent cried "Liberty or Death".
3) George Washington Doane: The men, to make a State, must be intelligent men. The right of suffrage is a fearful thing. It calls for wisdom, and discretion, and intelligence, of no ordinary standard. It takes in at every exercise, the interests of all the nation. Its results reach forward through time to eternity. The men, to make a State, must be honest. I mean men that consider always what is right, and do it at whatever cost. I mean men whom no king on earth can buy. Men that are in the market for highest bidder; men that make politics their trade, and look to office for a living; these are not the men to make a state. The men, to make a State, must be brave men. I mean men that dare to stand alone. I mean the men that are to-day where they were yesterday, and will be there tomorrow. I mean men that can stand and take the storm. The men to make a State must be religious men. I speak of men who have it in their heart as well as on their brow. The men that own no future, the men that trample on the Bible, the men that never pray, are not the men to make a state. The men to make a State are made by faith. A man that has no faith has no past for reverence; no future for reliance. The men to make a State are themselves made by obedience. Obedience is but self government in action; one he can never govern men who do not first govern himself.
Above references were taken from AMERICAN PATRIOTIC PROSE by August White Long, Copyright 1917. D.C. Heath & Co., Publishers Boston, New York, Chicago
Someone once said, those who ignore history are condemned to repeat history. America is not immune from the lessons of history. Contemporary Americans who ignore silent words by American patriots will never learn what mistakes to avoid or how to perpetuate their constitutional republic. George Washington might have suggested that politically correct patriotism like pretender patriotism are both dangerous frauds. Not identifying some well known contemporary conservatives, all their optimism combined all the optimism in the universe will not change inevitable reality. America as established by its Founding Fathers will eventually cease to exist or die. A more realistic appropriate goal is to delay the evitable.
American patriots, like all other American writers can never become great authors. Great writers only get published in the Bible; to presume or proclaim self appointed greatness is vain blasphemy. The goal of American patriotic writers is to inspire and teach contemporary and future patriots.
Perhaps my next writing exercise should review ethical consequences of voting in any election for internationalist, counterfeit conservative, counter American revolutionary, politically correct patriots. Then again, what were Bancroft's words: Darkness closed upon the country, but it was no night for sleep.
Ultimate question is not “if” but “when” America’s constitutional republic ceases to exist or die. Only children and immature adults believe that America’s constitutional republic will last forever. The question that should concern patriots, is will America’s constitutional republic end before its time? Those responsible for America’s constitutional republic premature time can be left for another writing exercise.
History predicts that America’s constitutional republic will be followed by some type of empire. Three possible options include following brutal anarchy, Americans unlike Europeans will not easily succumb to tyranny like Europeans did with Hitler’s Nazism.
Back to America’s future history options: 1) liberal Democratic Marxist-fascist Greenism serving power brokers, public subsidy addicts, many public employees, and illegal immigrants; 2) internationalist moderate Republicans and counterfeit conservatives trying to partner up with option one; and 3) still members to be determined constitutional empire.
Consider the following silent words by James Russell Lowell, “If the politicians must look after the parties, there should be someone to look after the politicians; somebody to ask disagreeable questions and to utter uncomfortable truths; someone to make sure, if possible before the election, not only what but whom the candidate is going to represent.”
Only remaining answer, your Christmas gift of stepping up to Colonel Travis’s line for Heaven’s favorite republic, not asking for much; just a down payment on what you owe America.
Merry Christmas
Those familiar with my writing exercises are familiar with my occasional “all writ” out notes. Some advantages of evolving from farmer’s son to hired gun, to part time senile licensed “Spy As a Verb” instructor, and full time Texas drifter should be noted another time.
Following silent patriot words offer ideas for you to consider while remembering the Judgment day is personal as one judged by what they do, not by what family, friends, neighbors, or compatriots do.
The Ten Commandments are not a living document allowing for interpretations or convenient changes. Example the command is honor thy father and mother, it does not say honor thy father and mother as long as doing so does not interfere with one’s pop culture life style.
An associate asked why I describe re-arranging words as writing exercises. Answer is not that complicated, when one compares my silent words to standards set by America's Founding Fathers some writing is too little too late.
Three of almost unlimited though mostly forgotten examples of words by patriots that seem to make a nice Christmas for patriots, enjoy.
1) Patrick Henry: Should I keep back my opinions at this time through fear of giving offence, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country and of an act of disloyalty towards the majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.
It is natural for man to indulge in illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts. Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst and provide for it.
Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased with the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, I know not what course others will take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death.
2) George Bancroft: Darkness closed upon the country, but it was no night for sleep. With one impulse the colonies sprung to arms; with one spirit they pledged themselves to each other "to be ready for the extreme event." With one heart the continent cried "Liberty or Death".
3) George Washington Doane: The men, to make a State, must be intelligent men. The right of suffrage is a fearful thing. It calls for wisdom, and discretion, and intelligence, of no ordinary standard. It takes in at every exercise, the interests of all the nation. Its results reach forward through time to eternity. The men, to make a State, must be honest. I mean men that consider always what is right, and do it at whatever cost. I mean men whom no king on earth can buy. Men that are in the market for highest bidder; men that make politics their trade, and look to office for a living; these are not the men to make a state. The men, to make a State, must be brave men. I mean men that dare to stand alone. I mean the men that are to-day where they were yesterday, and will be there tomorrow. I mean men that can stand and take the storm. The men to make a State must be religious men. I speak of men who have it in their heart as well as on their brow. The men that own no future, the men that trample on the Bible, the men that never pray, are not the men to make a state. The men to make a State are made by faith. A man that has no faith has no past for reverence; no future for reliance. The men to make a State are themselves made by obedience. Obedience is but self government in action; one he can never govern men who do not first govern himself.
Above references were taken from AMERICAN PATRIOTIC PROSE by August White Long, Copyright 1917. D.C. Heath & Co., Publishers Boston, New York, Chicago
Someone once said, those who ignore history are condemned to repeat history. America is not immune from the lessons of history. Contemporary Americans who ignore silent words by American patriots will never learn what mistakes to avoid or how to perpetuate their constitutional republic. George Washington might have suggested that politically correct patriotism like pretender patriotism are both dangerous frauds. Not identifying some well known contemporary conservatives, all their optimism combined all the optimism in the universe will not change inevitable reality. America as established by its Founding Fathers will eventually cease to exist or die. A more realistic appropriate goal is to delay the evitable.
American patriots, like all other American writers can never become great authors. Great writers only get published in the Bible; to presume or proclaim self appointed greatness is vain blasphemy. The goal of American patriotic writers is to inspire and teach contemporary and future patriots.
Perhaps my next writing exercise should review ethical consequences of voting in any election for internationalist, counterfeit conservative, counter American revolutionary, politically correct patriots. Then again, what were Bancroft's words: Darkness closed upon the country, but it was no night for sleep.
Ultimate question is not “if” but “when” America’s constitutional republic ceases to exist or die. Only children and immature adults believe that America’s constitutional republic will last forever. The question that should concern patriots, is will America’s constitutional republic end before its time? Those responsible for America’s constitutional republic premature time can be left for another writing exercise.
History predicts that America’s constitutional republic will be followed by some type of empire. Three possible options include following brutal anarchy, Americans unlike Europeans will not easily succumb to tyranny like Europeans did with Hitler’s Nazism.
Back to America’s future history options: 1) liberal Democratic Marxist-fascist Greenism serving power brokers, public subsidy addicts, many public employees, and illegal immigrants; 2) internationalist moderate Republicans and counterfeit conservatives trying to partner up with option one; and 3) still members to be determined constitutional empire.
Consider the following silent words by James Russell Lowell, “If the politicians must look after the parties, there should be someone to look after the politicians; somebody to ask disagreeable questions and to utter uncomfortable truths; someone to make sure, if possible before the election, not only what but whom the candidate is going to represent.”
Only remaining answer, your Christmas gift of stepping up to Colonel Travis’s line for Heaven’s favorite republic, not asking for much; just a down payment on what you owe America.
Merry Christmas
Tuesday, December 2, 2008
Continue Plus 96
A Christmas Play: Christmas Before Christmas
Players:
- Simon
- Anna a prophetess
- Quirinius Governor of Syria
- Census Taker
- Simon's Helper
- Two Visitors
Introduction:
(Simon praying in a temple)
Simon: Oh Heavenly Father forgive my selfishness. You have blessed me with the privilege of owning the finest olive gardens, the finest sheep herds, the finest inn, and the most profitable market in all of Judea. Yet my rapacious soul would trade all these earthly blessings for the honor of gazing upon your son the Messiah.
(Suddenly the still wind chimes introduced a saintly intruder)
Anna: You will not die until you have seen God's anointed King.
Act I
(Quirinius on a small throne in his temple with figure kneeling before him)
Quirinius: Rise my fool of a son (person rises). Caesar Augustus has ordered a census to be taken across the nation to make the collection of taxes more efficient. I am commanding you to carry out Caesar's orders in Judea. If you can accomplish this task I shall reward your efforts by making you tax collector for Judea.
New Census Taker: I wish to thank
Quirinius (interrupts): I have no time for fool's babble. Who is the most influential merchant in Judea?
Census Taker: Simon of Jerusalem, he has the finest olive gardens, the largest sheep herds, the finest inn, and the most profitable market.
Quirinius: I have heard of Simon, tell me more.
Census Taker: Simon is a devout man who refuses to engage in money lending or take an interest in politics.
Quirinius: Destroy this Simon of Jerusalem.
Census Taker: Why he is an honest merchant without enemies?
Quirinius: It is not Simon that could be a threat but the thieves who may use his wealth against us. Be gone, I have grown tired of you.
Act II
(Six months later - Quirinius on a small throne in his temple with Census Taker kneeling before him)
Quirinius: Rise, my fool of a son: Report to me about your progress on the census and Simon of Jerusalem.
Census Taker: The census taking process is on schedule. As for Simon of Jerusalem: I released locust into his olive gardens; I destroyed his sheep herds with plagues; I burned his inn; I had bandits steal his wealth; and I have incited riots at his market so none will shop there. I am ready to return as tax collector.
Quirinius (erupts in to rage): You fool you have signed both our death warrants. I ordered you to destroy Simon not his property. How can taxes be paid to Caesar with barren trees, dead sheep, ashes, empty coffers, or empty market places?
Guards let it be known that my fool son's inheritance shall be sent to Caesar to reimburse Simon's losses resulting from my fool son's actions. Let it also be known that my son of a fool shall be banished from Syria for the remainder of my life.
Act III
(Simon and Simon's Helper standing by three sided shelter)
Simon (pointing): Isn't it beautiful?
Simon's Helper: Sir how can a man who never cheated or punished the innocent; a man who has lost everything he earned his entire life; see beauty in THIS? Sir, every night, I shed tears of confusion not knowing why Heaven is punishing you.
Simon: My dearest life long friend, I see beauty in THIS because I see opportunity. As for heaven punishing me, stewards of faith know the difference between punishment and preparation.
Simon's Helper: Where's the opportunity in having a stable without a bucket to bring water, or straw for feed.
Visitor (enters stage): I am looking for Simon of Jerusalem.
Simon: I am Simon of Jerusalem.
Visitor: Many decades ago before I was born, you loaned my father this bucket. His dying words were that I return your bucket with five donkeys loaded with straw.
Simon: I grieve for the loss of an honest man. I greatly accept the return of my bucket. Heaven only asks for tithes of ten percent; it would be a sin for me to accept straw from your donkeys. Now I must go to the temple to pray for your loss.
(Turning to helper) Use the bucket to bring us water.
Conclusion
(Simon returns to stable to find stable half full of animals and Simon's Helper talking to another visitor)
Simon's Helper: Great news, a few more customers and you shall have enough profits to buy new sheep.
Simon: I thought I said I could not accept straw from the visitor?
Simon's Helper: The visitor insisted that the straw from five donkeys was a gift, not interest for a debt.
Simon: Who is the new visitor?
Simon's Helper: Some man less fortunate than us, the man can not afford shelter for his wife who about to give birth.
Simon: What were you telling this man who is less fortunate than us?
Simon's Helper: I was telling him that Heaven was preparing him not punishing him.
Simon (interrupts): And?
Simon's Helper: I shall tell Joseph that it would be an honor for you to share your stable; with him, his wife, and their soon to be born child.
Simon: I must return to the Temple to seek Anna's guidance.
(At the Temple)
Anna (to Simon): Eight days later during Mary's purification offering at this Temple, you will speak "Lord now I can die content for I have seen him as you promised."
(Pause - Simon and Anna freeze as Simon's Helper walks on stage)
Simon's Helper: Anna's prophecy came true and Simon found peace as a contented man. Simon later restored that which had been lost to the want be tax collector. I might add that his restoration work was made much easier by my loyalty. Let me tell you about my tireless efforts.
(Cast and all those involved in play break in while walking on stage singing – Oh Holy Night)
(Additional Christmas songs will follow if audience has time)
Players:
- Simon
- Anna a prophetess
- Quirinius Governor of Syria
- Census Taker
- Simon's Helper
- Two Visitors
Introduction:
(Simon praying in a temple)
Simon: Oh Heavenly Father forgive my selfishness. You have blessed me with the privilege of owning the finest olive gardens, the finest sheep herds, the finest inn, and the most profitable market in all of Judea. Yet my rapacious soul would trade all these earthly blessings for the honor of gazing upon your son the Messiah.
(Suddenly the still wind chimes introduced a saintly intruder)
Anna: You will not die until you have seen God's anointed King.
Act I
(Quirinius on a small throne in his temple with figure kneeling before him)
Quirinius: Rise my fool of a son (person rises). Caesar Augustus has ordered a census to be taken across the nation to make the collection of taxes more efficient. I am commanding you to carry out Caesar's orders in Judea. If you can accomplish this task I shall reward your efforts by making you tax collector for Judea.
New Census Taker: I wish to thank
Quirinius (interrupts): I have no time for fool's babble. Who is the most influential merchant in Judea?
Census Taker: Simon of Jerusalem, he has the finest olive gardens, the largest sheep herds, the finest inn, and the most profitable market.
Quirinius: I have heard of Simon, tell me more.
Census Taker: Simon is a devout man who refuses to engage in money lending or take an interest in politics.
Quirinius: Destroy this Simon of Jerusalem.
Census Taker: Why he is an honest merchant without enemies?
Quirinius: It is not Simon that could be a threat but the thieves who may use his wealth against us. Be gone, I have grown tired of you.
Act II
(Six months later - Quirinius on a small throne in his temple with Census Taker kneeling before him)
Quirinius: Rise, my fool of a son: Report to me about your progress on the census and Simon of Jerusalem.
Census Taker: The census taking process is on schedule. As for Simon of Jerusalem: I released locust into his olive gardens; I destroyed his sheep herds with plagues; I burned his inn; I had bandits steal his wealth; and I have incited riots at his market so none will shop there. I am ready to return as tax collector.
Quirinius (erupts in to rage): You fool you have signed both our death warrants. I ordered you to destroy Simon not his property. How can taxes be paid to Caesar with barren trees, dead sheep, ashes, empty coffers, or empty market places?
Guards let it be known that my fool son's inheritance shall be sent to Caesar to reimburse Simon's losses resulting from my fool son's actions. Let it also be known that my son of a fool shall be banished from Syria for the remainder of my life.
Act III
(Simon and Simon's Helper standing by three sided shelter)
Simon (pointing): Isn't it beautiful?
Simon's Helper: Sir how can a man who never cheated or punished the innocent; a man who has lost everything he earned his entire life; see beauty in THIS? Sir, every night, I shed tears of confusion not knowing why Heaven is punishing you.
Simon: My dearest life long friend, I see beauty in THIS because I see opportunity. As for heaven punishing me, stewards of faith know the difference between punishment and preparation.
Simon's Helper: Where's the opportunity in having a stable without a bucket to bring water, or straw for feed.
Visitor (enters stage): I am looking for Simon of Jerusalem.
Simon: I am Simon of Jerusalem.
Visitor: Many decades ago before I was born, you loaned my father this bucket. His dying words were that I return your bucket with five donkeys loaded with straw.
Simon: I grieve for the loss of an honest man. I greatly accept the return of my bucket. Heaven only asks for tithes of ten percent; it would be a sin for me to accept straw from your donkeys. Now I must go to the temple to pray for your loss.
(Turning to helper) Use the bucket to bring us water.
Conclusion
(Simon returns to stable to find stable half full of animals and Simon's Helper talking to another visitor)
Simon's Helper: Great news, a few more customers and you shall have enough profits to buy new sheep.
Simon: I thought I said I could not accept straw from the visitor?
Simon's Helper: The visitor insisted that the straw from five donkeys was a gift, not interest for a debt.
Simon: Who is the new visitor?
Simon's Helper: Some man less fortunate than us, the man can not afford shelter for his wife who about to give birth.
Simon: What were you telling this man who is less fortunate than us?
Simon's Helper: I was telling him that Heaven was preparing him not punishing him.
Simon (interrupts): And?
Simon's Helper: I shall tell Joseph that it would be an honor for you to share your stable; with him, his wife, and their soon to be born child.
Simon: I must return to the Temple to seek Anna's guidance.
(At the Temple)
Anna (to Simon): Eight days later during Mary's purification offering at this Temple, you will speak "Lord now I can die content for I have seen him as you promised."
(Pause - Simon and Anna freeze as Simon's Helper walks on stage)
Simon's Helper: Anna's prophecy came true and Simon found peace as a contented man. Simon later restored that which had been lost to the want be tax collector. I might add that his restoration work was made much easier by my loyalty. Let me tell you about my tireless efforts.
(Cast and all those involved in play break in while walking on stage singing – Oh Holy Night)
(Additional Christmas songs will follow if audience has time)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)